1963
DOI: 10.1029/jz068i009p02595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equatorial ionospheric variations during geomagnetic storms

Abstract: During geomagnetic storms, ionospheric Dst variations in the magnetic equatorial zone and low latitudes seem to be characterized by an increase of the maximum electron density of the F2 layer. This increase is confirmed by the electron density profile data. Possible causes of the increase are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The height of the F, peak rises in general (Matsushita, 1963). Hirao, et al, (1965) have recently reported that the peak Ne of the nighttime E region increased with increasing K in the middle latitudes.…”
Section: Nightsidementioning
confidence: 87%
“…The height of the F, peak rises in general (Matsushita, 1963). Hirao, et al, (1965) have recently reported that the peak Ne of the nighttime E region increased with increasing K in the middle latitudes.…”
Section: Nightsidementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Figures a–c illustrate the seasonal variation of ionospheric storm effects over MBAR, SHEB, and NAZR. P ionospheric storm effects are prevalent in all seasons (e.g., Adewale et al, ; Matsushita, , , Prölss, ) during both CME‐ and CIR‐driven storms. Most P ionospheric storm effects were observed in June solstice and September equinox over the Southern (MBAR) and Northern (SHEB) Hemisphere stations during CME‐driven storms.…”
Section: Seasonal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionospheric communities in India, Japan, and Taiwan did extraordinary amounts of work, with publications appearing in both less widely circulated national journals [e.g., Somayajulu et al , 1971; Chandra et al , 1973; Jain et al , 1978] as well as in those of western Europe and the United States [ Rastogi , 1962; Rastogi and Rajaram , 1965; Rajaram et al , 1971; Raghavarao and Sivaraman , 1973; Huang et al , 1974, 1987; Deshpande et al , 1977; Rastogi et al , 1979]. Prior to the widespread availability of TEC data, earlier works dealing with the low‐latitude response to geomagnetic activity were conducted using individual ionosonde stations and chains of stations during storms [e.g., Matsushita , 1963; Rajaram and Rastogi , 1969, 1970]. In the Matuura [1972] review of F region morphologies, two figures with TEC data were used to document how both positive and negative perturbations can be related to changes in the “fountain effect” associated with the ambient equatorial ionization anomaly.…”
Section: Multisite Tec Studies During Geomagnetic Stormsmentioning
confidence: 99%