“…This suggests that good entrepreneurs may not be able to easily access external funds even when the new firm is a positive net present value project. Basically, lenders either do not lend enough to a viable borrower or do not lend at all to them (Jaffee & Stiglitz, 1990;Keeton, 1979). This is a market failure, as lenders, if their goal is to maximize profit, should lend to viable borrowers if they represent a positive net present value project; the loan will be repaid.…”
Section: Credit Rationingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Credit rationing occurs when firms needing external financing for positive net present value projects either do not obtain all the money they need (Type I) or do not obtain any of the money they need (Type II) to implement the project (Jaffee & Stiglitz, 1990;Keeton, 1979 , 1989;Holtz-Eakin et aI., 1994a, 1994bLindh & Ohlsson, 1996). Pure credit rationing involves competition between banks which keep interest rates low and then randomly select which applicants get loans (Stiglitz & Weiss, 1981).…”
Section: Credit Rationingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, founders might not be truthful in releasing this infonnation as: a) they have the incentive to overstate their abilities, and/or b) they might not be willing to reveal specific infonnation about their innovation since that infonnation can be expropriated by outsiders. Thus, banks may ration credit to finns due to infonnation asymmetry (Jaffee & Russell, 1976;Jaffee & Stiglitz, 1990;Keeton, 1979;Stiglitz & Weiss, 1981), and the rationing problem is more prevalent for new finns than older finns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Credit rationing could inhibit a new finn's growth and survival, since this means that banks will not lend money, or will lend less than the optimal amount, to positive net present value projects (Becchetti, Garcia, & Trovato, 2011;Jaffee & Russell, 1976;Jaffee & Stiglitz, 1990; Keeton, 1979;Stiglitz & Weiss, 1981). With the possibility that creditors ration credit and turn down requests for all or part of the requested funds by viable new finns that objectively should be able to service the debt, new finns will be less able to successfully operate and grow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using multiple credit sources could provide access to additional debt capital 4 Type I credit rationing is defined as credit rationing that occurs when a partial amount of credit that is desired is provided by the creditor. In other words, the amount of credit that is extended by a creditor is positive but below the level that maximizes the firm's profit (Gale & Hellwig, 1985;Keeton, 1979). This is as opposed to Type II credit rationing which is the case where only a fraction ofthe applicants are able to obtain credit (Keeton, 1979;Stiglitz & Weiss, 1981).…”
DEDICATIONThis dissertation is dedicated to my immediate family (Widad, Martin, Naya, Peter Pan, GusGus, and Chuckles), parents, grandparents, and individuals that are trudging through the entrepreneurial trenches of joy.
“…This suggests that good entrepreneurs may not be able to easily access external funds even when the new firm is a positive net present value project. Basically, lenders either do not lend enough to a viable borrower or do not lend at all to them (Jaffee & Stiglitz, 1990;Keeton, 1979). This is a market failure, as lenders, if their goal is to maximize profit, should lend to viable borrowers if they represent a positive net present value project; the loan will be repaid.…”
Section: Credit Rationingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Credit rationing occurs when firms needing external financing for positive net present value projects either do not obtain all the money they need (Type I) or do not obtain any of the money they need (Type II) to implement the project (Jaffee & Stiglitz, 1990;Keeton, 1979 , 1989;Holtz-Eakin et aI., 1994a, 1994bLindh & Ohlsson, 1996). Pure credit rationing involves competition between banks which keep interest rates low and then randomly select which applicants get loans (Stiglitz & Weiss, 1981).…”
Section: Credit Rationingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, founders might not be truthful in releasing this infonnation as: a) they have the incentive to overstate their abilities, and/or b) they might not be willing to reveal specific infonnation about their innovation since that infonnation can be expropriated by outsiders. Thus, banks may ration credit to finns due to infonnation asymmetry (Jaffee & Russell, 1976;Jaffee & Stiglitz, 1990;Keeton, 1979;Stiglitz & Weiss, 1981), and the rationing problem is more prevalent for new finns than older finns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Credit rationing could inhibit a new finn's growth and survival, since this means that banks will not lend money, or will lend less than the optimal amount, to positive net present value projects (Becchetti, Garcia, & Trovato, 2011;Jaffee & Russell, 1976;Jaffee & Stiglitz, 1990; Keeton, 1979;Stiglitz & Weiss, 1981). With the possibility that creditors ration credit and turn down requests for all or part of the requested funds by viable new finns that objectively should be able to service the debt, new finns will be less able to successfully operate and grow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using multiple credit sources could provide access to additional debt capital 4 Type I credit rationing is defined as credit rationing that occurs when a partial amount of credit that is desired is provided by the creditor. In other words, the amount of credit that is extended by a creditor is positive but below the level that maximizes the firm's profit (Gale & Hellwig, 1985;Keeton, 1979). This is as opposed to Type II credit rationing which is the case where only a fraction ofthe applicants are able to obtain credit (Keeton, 1979;Stiglitz & Weiss, 1981).…”
DEDICATIONThis dissertation is dedicated to my immediate family (Widad, Martin, Naya, Peter Pan, GusGus, and Chuckles), parents, grandparents, and individuals that are trudging through the entrepreneurial trenches of joy.
In contrast to conventional understanding, an integrated theory of equilibrium credit rationing that allows restrictions on loan size as well as loan denials reveals a positive relationship between credit availability and interest rates when rationing by loan size (Gray, J. A. and Y. Wu, Journal of Macroeconomics 17: 405-420, 1995). This entry uses the US bank lending practices from 1997 to 2010 as a quasi-natural experiment to test the interest rate hypothesis under loan-size rationing. Based on the vector error correction analysis of commercial and industrial loans made by the US domestic banks to large and middle-market firms, there is a cointegrating relation that sufficient tightness of credit market conditions (either an average loan size less than $888,880 or a net percentage of banks tightening loan standards greater than À11%) rescues a positive relationship between loan sizes and loan rates. The net percentage of tightening banks plays a pivotal role in interacting with the size of loans and the demand for loans to maintain such a long-run equilibrium relationship.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.