1998
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations

Abstract: We describe and test a Markov chain model of microsatellite evolution that can explain the different distributions of microsatellite lengths across different organisms and repeat motifs. Two key features of this model are the dependence of mutation rates on microsatellite length and a mutation process that includes both strand slippage and point mutation events. We compute the stationary distribution of allele lengths under this model and use it to fit DNA data for di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeats in hum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
310
1
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
22
310
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the expansion of cTNRs in both domestic and wild species that do not use photoperiod to cue life‐history events could be caused by the lifting of evolutionary constraints on repeat size; however, this idea remains largely unsupported. Further, the considerable purity of these long repeats supports the claim that increased purity is the mechanism by which cTNRs mutate (Ananda et al., 2014; Gemayel et al., 2012; Kruglyak et al., 1998). Thus, it is plausible that the removal of selective constraints, due to domestication or nonreliance on photoperiod, has removed the necessity for stable repeat structures to avoid maladaptation and thus facilitated the expansion of cTNRs in these species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that the expansion of cTNRs in both domestic and wild species that do not use photoperiod to cue life‐history events could be caused by the lifting of evolutionary constraints on repeat size; however, this idea remains largely unsupported. Further, the considerable purity of these long repeats supports the claim that increased purity is the mechanism by which cTNRs mutate (Ananda et al., 2014; Gemayel et al., 2012; Kruglyak et al., 1998). Thus, it is plausible that the removal of selective constraints, due to domestication or nonreliance on photoperiod, has removed the necessity for stable repeat structures to avoid maladaptation and thus facilitated the expansion of cTNRs in these species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutational mechanism of cTNR structures has been associated with the purity of the repeat structure itself, where purer repeats are more likely to undergo further slippage (Kruglyak, Durrett, Schug, & Aquadro, 1998). This may be of adaptive value by generating phenotypic variation upon which selection can act (Kashi & King, 2006; Laidlaw et al., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hypothesis is that many protocols favor the isolation of microsatellites with long repeat arrays, which tend to be more variable than shorter arrays . Longer repeat arrays also tend to be rarer than short arrays, perhaps because of biases in mutation mechanisms that favor smaller repeat array sizes (Kruglyak et al, 1998;Eisen, 1999 ;Estoup & Cornuet, 1999 ;Falush & Iwasa, 1999 ;. Thus, there should be a tendency for long microsatellites isolated in the source population to decline in both length and variability in more distant populations and species Pascual et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the much higher mutation rate of microsatellites, estimated to be as high as 1 × 10 −5 [42] when compared to the 1 × 10 −9 for SNPs [48,57], can be a concern, especially for association and linkage disequilibrium studies.…”
Section: Statistical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%