1989
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(89)90061-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium loan pricing under the bank-client relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
161
1
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
161
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These hypotheses summarize the contradictory predictions from the models described above. H1 is consistent with the work of Fischer (1990), Sharpe (1990), and Greenbaum et al (1989). H2 summarizes the predictions from the Petersen and Rajan (1994) and Boot and Thakor (1994) models, which obviously contradict hypothesis H1.…”
Section: Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These hypotheses summarize the contradictory predictions from the models described above. H1 is consistent with the work of Fischer (1990), Sharpe (1990), and Greenbaum et al (1989). H2 summarizes the predictions from the Petersen and Rajan (1994) and Boot and Thakor (1994) models, which obviously contradict hypothesis H1.…”
Section: Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, competition can be restricted if bank and ®rm engage in a long-term relationship which gives the`house bank' an informational advantage and thus some ex post monopoly power. Greenbaum et al (1989) and Sharpe (1990) provide similar models in which long-term relationships between banks and ®rms may emerge endogenously. As in Fischer (1990), these models predict that the bank will develop informational monopoly power over`high quality' ®rms.…”
Section: Theoretical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5 See e.g. Greenbaum et al (1989), Petersen/Rajan (1995), Elsas (2001, pp.56) We expect that the above arguments about credit restrictions of SMEs apply even more to ethnic entrepreneurs and in particular immigrants, which tend to have higher information opacity and credit risk than native entrepreneurs. Ethnic minorities may be financially excluded because of "socio-economic limitations when financial services appear inaccessible to specific income, social or ethnic group either because of high costs, rationing, financial illiteracy, or discrimination" or "limitations of opportunity when talented new comers with profitable projects are denied finance because they lack fixed collateral or are not well connected" (Beck/de la Torre 2006, Anderloni/Carluccio 2007.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have high a probability to switch when they face severe financial constraints which cannot be resolved by the existing bank. The longer the existence of the incumbent relationship, the higher the probability that the borrower will find another lender (Greenbaum et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%