2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium pricing mechanism of low-carbon supply chain considering carbon cap-and-trade policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The imposition of carbon emission quota constraints can effectively regulate and limit production operations and energy consumption behaviors of enterprises, leading to adjustments in the production practices of high-carbon firms. This adjustment incurs increased production costs, ultimately diminishing the firms’ ability to negotiate product prices [ 21 ]. Based on Porter’s hypothesis, the implementation of effective carbon emission regulations can incentivize businesses to innovate in order to enhance production efficiency, thereby mitigating the financial burden associated with such regulations, known as the innovation compensation effect [ 17 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imposition of carbon emission quota constraints can effectively regulate and limit production operations and energy consumption behaviors of enterprises, leading to adjustments in the production practices of high-carbon firms. This adjustment incurs increased production costs, ultimately diminishing the firms’ ability to negotiate product prices [ 21 ]. Based on Porter’s hypothesis, the implementation of effective carbon emission regulations can incentivize businesses to innovate in order to enhance production efficiency, thereby mitigating the financial burden associated with such regulations, known as the innovation compensation effect [ 17 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen Zhu et al proposed a horizontal low-carbon supply chain, using game theory and chaos theory to explore dynamic production and emission reduction strategies under the scenario of whether manufacturers adopt green technologies or not [44]. Hao Zou et al considered several low-carbon technology investment manufacturers and several risk-averse retailers, incorporated the characteristics of carbon quota policy and risk aversion into the decision-making process of LSC network, and studied the effects of carbon trading price, risk avoidance coefficient and inventory capacity restriction on product flow, emission reduction rate, pricing and profit of low-emission networks [45]. Liangjie Xia et al incorporated consumers' low-carbon awareness and social preferences, including relationship and status preferences, into a game of emission reduction and promotion involving a manufacturer and a retailer in the long run, and also examined the impact of some key parameters on the decision-making and performance of channel members [46].…”
Section: Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions As Much As Possible During D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In low-carbon supply chain operation management, carbon emissions are a constraint in low-carbon supply chain design and planning [ 6 ]. Scholars have analyzed the carbon emission reduction coordination and production/pricing decisions based on classical game theory [ 7 , 8 ], and previous studies analyzed stakeholder low-carbon behavior under carbon emission reduction policies based on the evolutionary game theory [ 9 , 10 ]. In terms of research content, the above research analyzed the carbon emission reduction strategies of enterprises but not the low-carbon cooperation among cloud manufacturing service providers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%