2020
DOI: 10.1080/15700763.2020.1714058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equity and Excellence Among Arizona School Leaders: Encouraging Integration within a Segregative Policy Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, equity in the field of education should contribute to equal opportunities in access to studies regardless of gender [10,11], social origin, or ethnicity [12][13][14]. Equity must promote academic results and quality [15], so that students can access higher education and thus break the inequality gap [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In any case, equity in the field of education should contribute to equal opportunities in access to studies regardless of gender [10,11], social origin, or ethnicity [12][13][14]. Equity must promote academic results and quality [15], so that students can access higher education and thus break the inequality gap [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equity must promote academic results and quality [15], so that students can access higher education and thus break the inequality gap [16]. Therefore, it is essential to promote compensatory educational policies (schooling, resources, or scholarships and study aids) [4] and to develop organizational and cultural aspects in educational centers [17][18][19][20][21] to encourage leadership practices [6,13,17]. The interest in creating a more equitable educational system is evident [2,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the late 1990s, the U.S. experienced a wave of state-level anti-immigrant and English-Only initiatives that successfully banned bilingual instruction in California, Arizona, and Massachusetts, three states that combined enrolled nearly half (45%) of the nation’s EL students. Over the next two decades, scholars would document the socially and academically segregative effects of these English-only policies on EL students and their achievement (Cruze & López, 2020; Gándara & Hopkins, 2010). By 2015, however, the number of states offering bilingual certification had increased to 25, alongside a broad expansion of bilingual education through the growth of dual-language instructional programs designed for both EL and native English speaking students (Boyle et al, 2015).…”
Section: Intersecting Policy Contexts and Ever-el College-going Habitusmentioning
confidence: 99%