1986
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420160203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equity and individual preferences in an MDG

Abstract: Before participating in an Maximizing Difference Game (MDG) subjects were classified with the help of a social motive test (GDG, Liebrand, 1984)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When people know about an asymmetry, equity appears to become a preferred distributive principle (Messick and Schell, 1992;Van Dijk and Grodzka, 1992;Wilke et aL, 1986). An important proviso is that the asymmetry is regarded as fair (Messick and Schell, 1992;Van Dijk and Wilke, 1993).…”
Section: Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When people know about an asymmetry, equity appears to become a preferred distributive principle (Messick and Schell, 1992;Van Dijk and Grodzka, 1992;Wilke et aL, 1986). An important proviso is that the asymmetry is regarded as fair (Messick and Schell, 1992;Van Dijk and Wilke, 1993).…”
Section: Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%