2003
DOI: 10.1080/10570310309374765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equity and uncertainty in relational maintenance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
76
4
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
76
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure has been able to discriminate between distressed and non-distressed marital relationships (Norton, 1983). Reliability for the measure is generally high, split-half = .95, suggesting some redundancy in the items (Dainton, 2003). The coefficient alpha was equal to .95 and .96 for the dating and married samples, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This measure has been able to discriminate between distressed and non-distressed marital relationships (Norton, 1983). Reliability for the measure is generally high, split-half = .95, suggesting some redundancy in the items (Dainton, 2003). The coefficient alpha was equal to .95 and .96 for the dating and married samples, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One explanatory mechanism for these types of maintenance processes within relationships is relationship uncertainty (Dainton, 2003). The development of intimacy is a difficult process.…”
Section: Making the Connection: Social Comparison And Relationship Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both "over-benefited" partners (who receive more rewards relative to inputs compared to their partners) and "under-benefited" partners (who receive fewer rewards relative to inputs compared to their partners) will be less satisfied than those who perceive receiving rewards that match their expectations. 66 Thus, this theory goes beyond the typical cost-benefit analysis of the social exchange-based theories and posits additional relationships between power equity and satisfaction.…”
Section: Additional Theories Related To Social Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, equity theorists argue that individual partners will have a unique perception of equity, regardless of how members of the dyad share tasks in their relationship (Lennon & Rosenfeld, 1994). In addition, concern for obtaining equity has an effect on the individual's perception of relationship satisfaction (Alberts et al, 2011;Dainton, 2003;Mikula, Riederer, & Bodi, 2012), marital commitment (Tang & Curran, 2013), and may predict the mechanism by which couples engage in conflict (Bippus, Boren, & Worsham, 2008).…”
Section: Equity Theory and The Division Of Domestic Labormentioning
confidence: 99%