Equity in antenatal care quality: an analysis of 91 national household surveys

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundEmerging data show that many low-income and middle-income country (LMIC) health systems struggle to consistently provide good-quality care. Although monitoring of inequalities in access to health services has been the focus of major international efforts, inequalities in health-care quality have not been systematically examined.MethodsUsing the most recent (2007–16) Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys in 91 LMICs, we described antenatal care quality based on receipt of three essential services (blood pressure monitoring and urine and blood testing) among women who had at least one visit with a skilled antenatal-care provider. We compared quality across country income groups and quantified within-country wealth-related inequalities using the slope and relative indices of inequality. We summarised inequalities using random-effects meta-analyses and assessed the extent to which other geographical and sociodemographic factors could explain these inequalities.FindingsGlobally, 72·9% (95% CI 69·1–76·8) of women who used antenatal care reported blood pressure monitoring and urine and blood testing; this number ranged from 6·3% in Burundi to 100·0% in Belarus. Antenatal care quality lagged behind antenatal care coverage the most in low-income countries, where 86·6% (83·4–89·7) of women accessed care but only 53·8% (44·3–63·3) reported receiving the three services. Receipt of the three services was correlated with gross domestic product per capita and was 40 percentage points higher in upper-middle-income countries compared with low-income countries. Within countries, the wealthiest women were on average four times more likely to report good quality care than the poorest (relative index of inequality 4·01, 95% CI 3·90–4·13). Substantial inequality remained after adjustment for subnational region, urban residence, maternal age, education, and number of antenatal care visits (3·20, 3·11–3·30).InterpretationMany LMICs that have reached high levels of antenatal care coverage had much lower and inequitable levels of quality. Achieving ambitious maternal, newborn, and child health goals will require greater focus on the quality of health services and their equitable distribution. Equity in effective coverage should be used as the new metric to monitor progress towards universal health coverage.FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Variation in competent and respectful delivery care in Kenya and Malawi: a retrospective analysis of national facility surveys

“…Major ethnic, cultural and economic differences exist across regions in Kenya and the region dummies may capture some of these unmeasured factors. For example, others have found that women in lower wealth quintiles and those living in multidimensionally poor areas tend to receive lower quality maternity care . Kenya has had a long history of decentralisation dating back to the early 1980s, and differences in policies and resource allocation between regions may explain the variation in quality of care .…”

Coverage and equity of maternal and newborn health care in rural Nigeria, Ethiopia and India

“…One reason may be that they have the fewest choices in the type of provider they can access, because they lack the resources needed to bypass local facilities to seek better-quality care elsewhere. 6,35,36…”

“…3,4 Addressing inequities in access to and quality of health care is a priority now more than ever, as the poorest members of communities continue to bear the largest burden of ill health and consistently receive lower-quality care. 5,6 Recognizing this situation, health programmers in low-and middle-income countries have, over the past decade, aimed to implement strategies that favour the poorest members of communities and promote community linkages within primary health care. [7][8][9][10] Certain interventions, such as training community members to make health promotion visits to families, have improved the practice of healthy behaviours in communities and increased care-seeking in health facilities.…”

The Utilization of Quality Antenatal Care in Pakistan: Analyzing Health Inequity in Various Periods

“…Previous studies examined the utilization of maternal healthcare through combinations of factors including inequity, wealth, education, region, ethnicity, religion, occupation, and migration status. (Arsenault et al, 2018;Braveman, 2005;Harper et al, 2008;Zere et al, 2013). Secondly, it used a single indicator (skilled birth attendant) of quality antenatal care whereas previous studies used a variety of measures, such as the number of antenatal care visits, institutional delivery of a child, and the increase of tetanus injections (Gebre, Worku & Bukola, 2018;Hajizadeh et al, 2014;Majrooh et al, 2014;Mwase et al, 2018;Nair & Panda, 2011).…”