Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?

Abstract

Efforts to promote equity in healthcare involve implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of healthcare disparities and promote equal access to care. One such program is the public social healthcare protection schemes. However, like many other developing countries, Tanzania has low health insurance coverage, hindering its efforts to achieve universal health coverage. This study examines the role of equity in public social healthcare protection and its effects on household healthcare financing in Tanzania. The study used secondary data collected from the National Bureau of Statistics' National Panel Survey 2020/21 and stratified households based on their place of residence (rural vs. urban). Moreover, the logit regression model, ordered logit, and the endogenous switching regression model were used to provide counterfactual estimates without selection bias and endogeneity problems. The results showed greater variations in social health protection across rural and urban households, increasing disparities in health outcomes between these areas. Rural residents are the most vulnerable groups. Furthermore, education, income, and direct healthcare costs significantly influence equity in healthcare financing and the ability of households to benefit from public social healthcare protection schemes. To achieve equity in healthcare in rural and urban areas, developing countries need to increase investment in health sector by reducing the cost of healthcare, which will significantly reduce household healthcare financing. Furthermore, the study recommends that social health protection is an essential strategy for improving fair access to quality healthcare by removing differences across households and promoting equality in utilizing healthcare services.

Stroke characteristics and outcomes in urban Tanzania: Data from the Prospective Lake Zone Stroke Registry

“…Lack of health insurance coverage could be a key barrier toward delivery of quality of stroke care in this region. While recent figures indicate that only 32% of the Tanzanian population have health insurance coverage, 9 our data illustrate the urgent need for advocating access to universal health insurance coverage which will facilitate provision of essential services to all stroke patients that will ultimately reduce morbidity and mortality. 29 Similarly, based on these findings, we are developing systems for documentation of all key elements of the World Stroke Organization Roadmap to serve as a foundation for quality improvement.…”

“…Nationally, there are 15 neurologists with no neurology centers serving a national population of 66 million and only 32% of the Tanzanian population possessing health insurance coverage. 9 BMC is a large tertiary academic hospital in Northwestern Tanzania and serves a catchment population of 15 million people. It is the main referral hospital for people with strokes, particularly those who reside along the shores of Lake Victoria (Figure 1).…”

Does National Health Protection Cover the Vulnerable Groups in Indonesia? A Case Study of Waste Pickers in Surabaya

“…Defining who is poor, legal requirements, and the unaffordability of health coverage are obstacles in many African countries such as Ghana, Tanzania, Kenya, Rwanda, and Ethiopia. 8,9 Meanwhile, the World Health Organization (WHO) argues that good governance practices of health protection provide better access for the poor.…”

Prevalence, treatment, and factors associated with cryptococcal meningitis post introduction of integrase inhibitors antiretroviral based regimens among people living with HIV in Tanzania

“…The use of a drug like amphotericin B requires laboratory tests prior to and during the time of using the drug in order to prevent patients from toxicity [29]. The latter increases the cost of treatment, taking into consideration that the majority of people in developing countries rely on out-of-pocket mode of payment and the level of poverty could be a reason why healthcare providers (HCPs) opt to use fluconazole alone [30].…”