2019
DOI: 10.7900/jot.2018feb02.2211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence of Fell bundles over groups

Abstract: We give a notion of equivalence for Fell bundles over groups, not necessarily saturated nor separable. The equivalence between two Fell bundles is implemented by a bundle of Hilbert bimodules with some extra structure. Suitable cross-sectional spaces of such a bundle turn out to be imprimitivity bimodules for the cross-sectional C∗-algebras of the involved Fell bundles. We show that amenability is preserved under this equivalence.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. The same proof given in [1] for groups extends to inverse semigroups. Using Lemma 5.2 we may now see A ⊗ min B and A ⊗ max B as Fell bundles over S whose bundle structure comes as a continuous extension of that of the "algebraic" bundle A ⊙ B = (A s ⊙ B) s∈S .…”
Section: Tensor Products Of Fell Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. The same proof given in [1] for groups extends to inverse semigroups. Using Lemma 5.2 we may now see A ⊗ min B and A ⊗ max B as Fell bundles over S whose bundle structure comes as a continuous extension of that of the "algebraic" bundle A ⊙ B = (A s ⊙ B) s∈S .…”
Section: Tensor Products Of Fell Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It is, however, not yet known whether the weak containment property for A implies its approximation property. 1 Lastly, Kranz recently [26] generalized the notion of approximation property so as to cover Fell bundles over (second countable) locally compact Hausdorff étale groupoids, and derived some of the expected results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%