“…The question of whether such a scaling is able to generate a master curve of the data, and hence, the variations of g(ω) can be explained in terms of elastic medium transformations is still highly debated. So far, the accumulated evidence is apparently in favor of opposite views: on one hand, the BP evolution in sodium silicate glasses (cooled [13], compressed [16], hy-perquenched [3] and permanently densified samples [4]) and in an epoxy-amine mixture during chemical vitrification [19] is controlled by changes in the system's elasticity, according to the Debye scaling law; on the other hand, the BP variations in network forming glasses like silica and GeO 2 upon cooling [14,15,23], in permanently densified silica [17], and in few polymers under pressure [20,21] are stronger than the elastic medium transformation, and the Debye scaling does not work. In light of such controversial results the question we face is the following: Do these results really conflict, or rather there is a general explanation in terms of the elastic properties of the systems?…”