Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis – ERRATUM

Wu, Yin; Levis, Brooke; Riehm, Kira E.; Saadat, Nazanin; Levis, Alexander W.; Azar, Marleine; Rice, Danielle B; Boruff, Jill; Cuijpers, Pim; Gilbody, Simon; Ioannidis, John P. A.; ., .; McMillan, Dean; Patten, Scott B.; Shrier, Ian; Ziegelstein, Roy C.; Akena, Dickens H.; Arroll, Bruce; Ayalon, Liat; Baradaran, Hamid Reza; Baron, Murray; Bombardier, Charles H.; Butterworth, Peter; Chagas, Marcos Hortes Nisihara; Chan, Juliana C.N.; Cholera, Rushina; Conwell, Yeates; Ginkel, Janneke M. de Man‐van; Fann, Jesse R.; Fischer, Felix; Fung, Daniel; Gelaye, Bizu; Goodyear‐Smith, Felicity; Greeno, Catherine G.; Hall, Brian J.; Harrison, Patricia A.; Härter, Martin; Hegerl, Ulrich; Hides, Leanne; Hobfoll, Stevan E.; Hudson, Marie; Hyphantis, Thomas; Inagaki, Masumi; Khamseh, Mohammad E.; Kiely, Kim M.; Kwan, Yunxin; Lamers, Femke; Liu, Shen Ing; Lotrakul, Manote; Loureiro, Sônia Regina; Löwe, Bernd; Sidik, Sherina Mohd; Munhoz, Tiago N.; Muramatsu, Kumiko; Osório, Flávia L.; Patel, V.A.; Pence, Brian W.; Persoons, Philippe; Picardi, Angelo; Reuter, Katrin; Rooney, Alasdair G; Santos, Iná S.; Shaaban, Juwita; Sidebottom, Abbey; Simning, Adam; Sung, So-Young; Tan, Pei Lin Lynnette; Turner, Alyna; Weert, Henk van; White, Jennifer; Whooley, Mary A.; Winkley, Kirsty; Yamada, Mitsuhiko; Benedetti, Andrea; Thombs, Brett D.

doi:10.1017/s0033291719002137

Cited by 21 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The items are scored on a four-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 with participants' ratings reflecting the depression experienced over the preceding 2 weeks (0-not at all, 1-several days, 2-more than half of the days over this 2-week period, and 3-nearly every day). Previous studies suggest that the total score ranges from 0 to 27 (0-4: without depression symptoms, 5-9: with mild depression symptoms, 10-14: with moderate depression symptoms, 15-19: with moderate to severe depression symptoms, and 20-27: with severe depression symptoms) (21).…”

Section: Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Cross-Sectional Study on Mental Health Problems of Medical and Nonmedical Students in Shandong During the COVID-19 Epidemic Recovery Period

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a plethora of psychological problems worldwide since its onset in December 2019. In the upheaval period, compared with medical college students, nonmedical students' psychological state deserves additional concern due to their lack of medical knowledge. Although the epidemic in China has been largely controlled for several months, the mental health problems resulting from the COVID-19 epidemic persist to this day. In this study, we assessed the mental health problems and associated risk factors experienced by nonmedical vs. medical college students in universities of Shandong Province during the COVID-19 epidemic recovery period.Methods: An online survey was conducted over the period from 17 to 19 December 2020. A total of 954 Chinese college students (486 nonmedical and 468 medical students) from three universities of Shandong Province participated in the survey. Mental health variables were assessed with use of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI).Results: Compared with medical students, nonmedical college students had higher prevalence rates of depression (53.9 vs. 46.4%; p = 0.020) and insomnia (28.0 vs. 22.4%, p = 0.049), as well as higher total scores on the PHQ-9 (p = 0.03) and ISI (p < 0.01). Among nonmedical college students, being female and native of non-Shandong were risk factors for anxiety and depression (p < 0.01), while only native of non-Shandong for insomnia (p < 0.01). Among medical students, age (p < 0.01) and living in rural areas (p = 0.04) were risk factors for depression, while only age (p < 0.05) was a risk factor for anxiety and insomnia.Conclusion: Nonmedical college students in the universities of Shandong Province had more mental health problems and more risk factors for developing them during the COVID-19 epidemic recovery period than medical students. These nonmedical students require additional attention and recovery programs to alleviate the increased incidence of psychological problems related to COVID-19.

show abstract

Section: Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Cross-Sectional Study on Mental Health Problems of Medical and Nonmedical Students in Shandong During the COVID-19 Epidemic Recovery Period

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Respondents are asked to assess the frequency of symptoms in the past two weeks on a 4-point response scale from 0 (“Not at all”) to 3 (“Nearly every day”), with a total score range from 0 to 24. A clinical cut-off score of ≥10 has been recommended to indicate probable current depression [ 74 , 75 ]. There were no missing data for the PHQ-8, and the Cronbach’s α in this study was 0.87.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Mixed Methods Integration to Evaluate the Structure of Help-Seeking Barriers Scale: A Survivor-Centered Approach

Thorvaldsdottir

Halldórsdóttir

Arnault

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the high prevalence of adverse health and trauma-related outcomes associated with intimate partner violence (IPV), help-seeking and service utilization among survivors is low. This study is part of a larger mixed-methods and survivor-centered validation study on the Icelandic Barriers to Help-Seeking for Trauma (BHS-TR) scale, a new barriers measure focused on trauma recovery. A mixed-methods legitimation strategy of integration was employed to evaluate the BHS-TR structure in samples of IPV survivors. The merging of qualitative (n = 17) and quantitative (n = 137) data through a joint display analysis revealed mainly complementarity findings, strengthening the scale’s overall trustworthiness and validity evidence. Divergent findings involved items about mistrust, perceived rejection, stigmatization, fearing vulnerability, and safeguarding efforts that were significant help-seeking barriers in the survivors’ narratives, whereas factor analysis indicated their removal. These BHS-TR items were critically evaluated in an iterative spiraling process that supported the barriers’ influence, illuminated core issues, and guided potential refinements. This work contributes to the growing field of mixed methods instrument validation placing equal status on qualitative and quantitative methods and emphasizing integration to provide more complete insights. Moreover, the study’s findings highlight the added value of further exploring divergence between two sets of data and the importance of giving attention to the voices of the target population throughout the validation process.

show abstract

“…The PHQ‐8 is derived from the nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ‐9), which is validated in SSc (13). A large individual participant data meta‐analysis found that the correlation between PHQ‐8 and PHQ‐9 scores was 0.996 (14). PHQ‐8 scores can range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mental Health Care Use and Associated Factors in Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient‐Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study

Becetti

Nguyen

Kwakkenbos

et al. 2022

ACR Open Rheumatology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Systemic sclerosis (SSc) has significant psychosocial implications. We aimed to evaluate the proportion of participants in a large international SSc cohort who used mental health services in a 3‐month period and to evaluate demographic, psychological, and disease‐specific factors associated with use. Methods Baseline data of participants enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient‐Centered Intervention Network Cohort were analyzed. We determined the proportion that used mental health services and the source of services in the 3 months prior to enrollment. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with service use. Results Of the 2319 participants included in the analysis, 417 (18%) used mental health services in the 3 months prior to enrollment. General practitioners were the most common mental health service providers (59%), followed by psychologists (25%) and psychiatrists (19%). In multivariable analysis, mental health service use was independently associated with higher education (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03‐1.11), smoking (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02‐1.11), being retired (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38‐0.93), having limited SSc (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02‐1.89), and having higher anxiety symptom scores (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03‐1.06) and lower self‐efficacy scores (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83‐0.97). Variables not significantly associated included age, race, disease manifestations, depression symptom scores, and body image distress. Conclusion About 18% of participants in a large international cohort received mental health services in a 3‐month period, of whom the majority received these services from a general practitioner.

show abstract

Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis – ERRATUM

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

A Cross-Sectional Study on Mental Health Problems of Medical and Nonmedical Students in Shandong During the COVID-19 Epidemic Recovery Period

A Cross-Sectional Study on Mental Health Problems of Medical and Nonmedical Students in Shandong During the COVID-19 Epidemic Recovery Period

Using Mixed Methods Integration to Evaluate the Structure of Help-Seeking Barriers Scale: A Survivor-Centered Approach

Mental Health Care Use and Associated Factors in Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient‐Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About