2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.08.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalent acoustic impedance model. Part 2: analytical approximation

Abstract: To cite this version:B. Faverjon, Christian Soize. Equivalent acoustic impedance model. Part 2: analytical approximation. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Elsevier, 2004, 276 (3-5) In the context of the prediction of noise levels in vibroacoustic systems, numerical models or analytical models can be developed. Generally, numerical models are adapted to the low and medium frequency ranges and analytical models to the medium and high frequency ranges. For analytical models, a classical approximation consists in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Designing a quiet structure and considering the mechanical vibration and acoustic characteristics in the design stage of the product is the fundamental method to optimize the radiation resistance of a structure based on the theory of a lumped parameter model, which was developed by Koopmann et al [4][5][6] The resistance matrix of the structure can be obtained by analytical and numerical methods, which are suitable for products with simple boundary conditions. 2,7 There are still accounts of acoustic boundary value problems that are difficult to compute with the numerical method for the complexity of the geometrical shape. 8,9 The singularity problem has not been totally solved, although some progress had been made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing a quiet structure and considering the mechanical vibration and acoustic characteristics in the design stage of the product is the fundamental method to optimize the radiation resistance of a structure based on the theory of a lumped parameter model, which was developed by Koopmann et al [4][5][6] The resistance matrix of the structure can be obtained by analytical and numerical methods, which are suitable for products with simple boundary conditions. 2,7 There are still accounts of acoustic boundary value problems that are difficult to compute with the numerical method for the complexity of the geometrical shape. 8,9 The singularity problem has not been totally solved, although some progress had been made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alberich syntony was studied in Germany in the Second World War to get better performance of syntony absorption through columns cavum. At present, inverse bugle and canister cavum are widely used in underwater absorption structure to get better syntony absorption coefficient in wide frequency band, and depress the reflection coefficient by shadow impedance [4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one consists in a 3D-spectral (or 3D-wave-number) domain formulation (Fourier transform with respect to the space domain) [9; 27; 29; 38; 46] and the second one is a 2D-spectral (or 2D-wave-number) domain formulation (Fourier Transform with respect to the two infinite dimensions of the space domain) for which the boundary value problem is solved in a 1D-space domain (corresponding to the third finite dimension ) [13; 39]. Such methods can induce numerical difficulties which can be avoided by using an adapted algebraic formulation which can be tricky to implement (see for instance [13]). Hoop technique which is, as far as we know, the only available time-domain exact analytical method [8; 11; 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%