2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(02)00011-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalent linear method considering frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…PGA is overestimated more than 1.5 times in SHAKE in many cases which agrees with the discussion in Ref. [4] and Figure 5. Figure 10 shows ratio of PGA in each soil profile.…”
Section: Equivalent Linear Vs Truly Nonlinearsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…PGA is overestimated more than 1.5 times in SHAKE in many cases which agrees with the discussion in Ref. [4] and Figure 5. Figure 10 shows ratio of PGA in each soil profile.…”
Section: Equivalent Linear Vs Truly Nonlinearsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Since stress-strain relationships is a linear line passing the point A (γ eff , τ=Gγ eff ), maximum stress at γ=γ max (τ 1 at point C) is larger than the actual stress (τ 2 at point B), which overestimation of the maximum shear stress result in overestimation of the maximum acceleration (See section 6.2 on the mechanism). Figure 6 Underestimation of amplification at high frequencies [4] The second shortage is typically seen in Figure 6. Amplification is significantly underestimated at high frequency.…”
Section: Shakementioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Artificia compared with similar simulation from literature [22]. One dimensional equivalent linear vertical wave propagation analysis is the widely used numerical procedure for modeling soil amplification problem [2,23] as discussed in the earlier section. In one dimensional wave propagation analysis, soil deposit is assumed to be having number of horizontal layers with different shear modulus (G), damping () and unit weight () as shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Site-specific Ground Response Analysis For Delhi Region-a Camentioning
confidence: 99%