1975
DOI: 10.1090/memo/0156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivariant singular homology and cohomology. I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundary operator is given as the restriction of the boundary operator of the singular chain complex of X . We show below (Theorem 2.9) that this chain complex is naturally isomorphic to Illman's chain complex [13], which defines the Bredon-Illman equivariant homology of X with coefficients in L, H G q (X; L). The main theorem of the paper is the following.…”
Section: Equivariant Mccord's Topological Groups and Equivariant Homomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The boundary operator is given as the restriction of the boundary operator of the singular chain complex of X . We show below (Theorem 2.9) that this chain complex is naturally isomorphic to Illman's chain complex [13], which defines the Bredon-Illman equivariant homology of X with coefficients in L, H G q (X; L). The main theorem of the paper is the following.…”
Section: Equivariant Mccord's Topological Groups and Equivariant Homomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Illman [13], given any (covariant) coefficient system, there is an ordinary equivariant homology theory H G * (−; M ) with M as coefficients. Moreover, given any natural transformation µ : M −→ N of coefficient systems, there is an extension of it to a natural transformation µ : H G * (−; M ) −→ H G * (−; N ) of (ordinary) homology theories.…”
Section: Proposition 33 There Are Natural Bijectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now let C = z£. The first map induces an //*(-; ¥p)-isomorphism by [NI], and so a homotopy equivalence after completion (see [BK,I,5.5]), while the second is shown in [JMO, loc. cit.] to be a homotopy equivalence.…”
Section: Finitely Generated Z£-modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p-adic completion of a space X that we refer to is the (F^^X of [BK,I,§4.2], which we denote by Xp . However, unless X is nilpotent (e.g., simply-connected), X£ need not be p-complete in the sense of [BK,I,§5 & VII,§2], and so it enjoys few of the properties associated with completion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation