Eradication of Brucella ovis from the Falkland Islands 1977-1993

Reichel, M.; Baber, D.; Armitage, PW; Lampard, D.; R, Whitley; Hilbink, F.

doi:10.1136/vr.134.23.595

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…ovis in sheep in several countries. Using this test and slaughter approach, the infection has been eradicated from the Falkland Islands (Reichel et al., ), the Flinders and King Islands of Australia and selected areas of New Zealand (Ridler and West, ).…”

Section: Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Parameter 2 -Effectiveness of killing animals (at farm level or within the farm) for reducing/stopping spread of the disease The killing of B. ovis-infected rams (identified by serological tests and clinical palpation) has been implemented for eradicating B. ovis in sheep in several countries. Using this test and slaughter approach, the infection has been eradicated from the Falkland Islands (Reichel et al, 1994), the Flinders and King Islands of Australia and selected areas of New Zealand (Ridler and West, 2011).…”

Section: Effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): ovine epididymitis (Brucella ovis)

More¹,

Bøtner²,

Butterworth

et al. 2017

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ovine epididymitis (Brucella ovis) has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of ovine epididymitis to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of ovine epididymitis according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to ovine epididymitis. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, ovine epididymitis can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL. The disease would comply with the criteria as in Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in points (c), (d) and (e) of Article 9(1). The animal species to be listed for ovine epididymitis according to Article 8(3) criteria are mainly sheep and other species of the families Bovidae and Cervidae as susceptible and sheep and deer as reservoirs.

show abstract

Section: Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%