2004
DOI: 10.3354/meps272069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eradication of the invasive seaweed Caulerpa taxifolia by chlorine bleach

Abstract: We investigated the fate of fragments of the invasive seaweed Caulerpa taxifolia from southern California, USA, after exposure to chlorine (10, 15, 50, 125 ppm Cl -at 20 to 23°C and 10 to 11°C) or temperature shock (7 to 10°C, 72°C). Chlorine bleach is currently being used to eradicate C. taxifolia in southern California. At temperatures favorable to growth, ~70% of the fragments survived at chlorine concentrations below 50 ppm; 1 fragment survived at 50 ppm, and none survived at 125 ppm. Within 2 wk, many of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lime is effective against tunicates (Carver et al 2003;Denny 2008), but less successful against other fouling species (Piola et al 2010). Chlorination using chlorine bleach kills arbitrarily, so its use as an effective eradication treatment is considered tenuous (Williams and Schroeder 2004). It has proven efficient against a range of fouling organisms (Denny 2008;Piola et al 2010), yet has been found to have no impact on some tunicates (Carver et al 2003).…”
Section: Physical Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lime is effective against tunicates (Carver et al 2003;Denny 2008), but less successful against other fouling species (Piola et al 2010). Chlorination using chlorine bleach kills arbitrarily, so its use as an effective eradication treatment is considered tenuous (Williams and Schroeder 2004). It has proven efficient against a range of fouling organisms (Denny 2008;Piola et al 2010), yet has been found to have no impact on some tunicates (Carver et al 2003).…”
Section: Physical Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No delay in eradication was necessary because a full year was required to treat all infested areas. There were lost opportunities to measure the relative efficacy of light reduction versus chlorine in the eradication (Williams and Schroeder 2004), which would have provided a basis to potentially reduce hazardous chlorine applications near urban settlements, residual chemical effects on nontarget biota, and cost. Information on the temperature and light regimes and algal growth rates in infested areas also is not available, which would be invaluable to target areas of potential establishment and predict spread rates.…”
Section: Two Case Histories: the Introductions Of Caulerpa And Spartinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the number of invasions and their subsequent effects will only increase (Bax et al 2001). Also, we must consider that climate change is likely to shift the distribution of suitable areas for many species, including Caulerpa (Williams and Schroeder 2004). Thus, this model, as any other model, is a temporary tool in need of constant adaptation to new environmental and human factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%