2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2016.7541613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erasure broadcast networks with receiver caching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, in wireless networks, a line of prior works 55,[136][137][138] has considered caching in the presence of noisy links and feedback. In related works, [139][140][141][142][143] caching as an aide to wireless interference mitigation was studied.…”
Section: Impact On System Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in wireless networks, a line of prior works 55,[136][137][138] has considered caching in the presence of noisy links and feedback. In related works, [139][140][141][142][143] caching as an aide to wireless interference mitigation was studied.…”
Section: Impact On System Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25]- [27] the gains of caching in noisy broadcast networks are investigated. Specifically, we have proposed a joint cache-channel coding scheme and focused on erasure BCs with two sets of receivers: a set of cache-aided weak receivers (where each channel has the same erasure probability) and a set of strong receivers without cache memories (where each channel has the same erasure probability).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint cache-channel coding scheme in [25]- [27] loads (piggybacks) the information that is intended for the strong receivers, but is already cached at the weaker receivers, onto the information that is communicated to the weak receivers 1 . When the rate of the piggybacked information is modest, this can be done without harming the decoding performance at the strong receivers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations