GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2009.5426098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erasure Codes with a Banded Structure for Hybrid Iterative-ML Decoding

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents new FEC codes for the erasure channel, LDPC-Band, that have been designed so as to optimize a hybrid iterative-Maximum Likelihood (ML) decoding. Indeed, these codes feature simultaneously a sparse parity check matrix, which allows an efficient use of iterative LDPC decoding, and a generator matrix with a band structure, which allows fast ML decoding on the erasure channel. The combination of these two decoding algorithms leads to erasure codes achieving a very good trade-off betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the complexity of the GE algorithm can be reduced if the system matrix is structured in some specific way. For instance, the use of a band structure to reduce the ML decoding complexity has been studied in [11] and [10]. In this section, we show that the parity check matrix of QC-LDPC codes features such a "hidden" band structure, that allows for considerably reducing the complexity of ML decoding with standard GE.…”
Section: Pseudo-band Matrix Transformation and ML Decoding Complmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is well known that the complexity of the GE algorithm can be reduced if the system matrix is structured in some specific way. For instance, the use of a band structure to reduce the ML decoding complexity has been studied in [11] and [10]. In this section, we show that the parity check matrix of QC-LDPC codes features such a "hidden" band structure, that allows for considerably reducing the complexity of ML decoding with standard GE.…”
Section: Pseudo-band Matrix Transformation and ML Decoding Complmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, as we detail in Section IV, the definition of the encoding window used in our paper is not the same as in [20] due to the different goal of our work. Other related approaches based on the concept of encoding window can be found in [21], [22]. However, as in [20], both papers consider a simple source-receiver scenario and do not consider recombinations at the network nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In detail, [21] proposes an LDPC scheme that aims at minimizing the memory accesses during encoding, but the properties of the code are shown for very large block sizes and windows, which would be an issue for multimedia applications. In [22], a class of LDPC codes with a hybrid iterative/maximum likelihood decoding scheme is presented, where the generator matrix is designed to have a banded structure so to reduce the maximum likelihood decoding complexity. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to leverage the concept of encoding window to solve the problem of preserving the decoding complexity through the recombinations at the network nodes, which is the main novelty of our work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute the latter value, we count the number of times a received packet is subtracted from an encoded packet and the number of operations needed to invert the matrices. The method used is similar to [11]. Please note that one operation represents a linear combination of two vectors, as this is the most complex component of an operation; we neglect the multiplication of a vector by a scalar and the size of the vector as these are simple operations.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Code Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%