Erect Penile Dimensions in a Cohort of 778 Middle Eastern Men: Establishment of a Nomogram

Habous, Mohamad; Tealab, Alaa; Williamson, Ben; Binsaleh, Saleh; Dawy, Sherif El; Mahmoud, Saad; Abdelwahab, Osama; Nassar, Mamdouh I.; Mulhall, John P.; Veale, David; Muir, Gordon

doi:10.1111/jsm.12894

Cited by 21 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…9 La revisión sistemática más grande publicada incluyó 15,521 hombres y entre las variables analizadas reportó una longitud promedio en flacidez de 9.16 cm y alargado de 13.24 cm, con longitud en erección de 13.2, circunferencia en reposo de 9 cm y en erección de 11.66 cm (Cuadro 4). 10,11,[13][14][15] Pocos estudios han evaluado la relación entre la longitud del pene y los parámetros somatométricos. El ensayo de Shah no informa ninguna correlación entre la talla o tamaño del pie con la longitud del pene.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…El último nomograma realizado incluye 21 estudios, de 1985 a 2014, en diferentes países, pero no toma en cuenta ningún estudio efectuado en México ni América Latina; por tanto, no pueden extrapolarse a nuestro medio y la mayor parte de los estudios no señalan medidas antropométricas asociadas con el tamaño del pene. 10,11 En América Latina solo existe un estudio publicado en Guatemala respecto del tamaño del pene. 12 Por lo anterior, el objetivo primario de este estudio fue: correlacionar las dimensiones del pene en flacidez (longitud y diámetro) con el peso, talla, índice de masa corporal (IMC) e índice cintura-cadera en la población mexicana adulta.…”

Section: Antecedentesunclassified

“…Cuadro 4. Medidas de longitud y diámetro del pene en distintas series 10,11,[13][14][15] Para consultar el texto completo de los artículos deberá registrarse por una sola vez con su correo electrónico, crear una contraseña, indicar su nombre, apellidos y especialidad.…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Correlación entre medidas antropométricas y peneanas en la población mexicana

Córdova

Mena²,

Segovia³

et al. 2018

rmu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJETIVO: Correlacionar las dimensiones del pene en flacidez (longitud y diámetro) con medidas antropométricas en la población mexicana adulta. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal efectuado en hombres que acudieron al servicio de Urología del Hospital General de México, entre marzo y octubre de 2017. Se determinaron las medidas de circunferencia de la base del pene, circunferencia del surco balano-prepucial; longitud de la base a la punta y longitud de la base a la punta en estiramiento; además, se buscaron correlaciones entre éstas y datos antropométricos como: talla, peso, índice de masa corporal e índice cintura-cadera. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 150 pacientes. La talla media fue de 1.65 m (± 0.76), IMC 27 kg/m2 (± 4.3) e índice cintura-cadera 1.02 (± 0.133). En cuanto a las medidas peneanas: longitud de la base a la punta 8.7 cm (± 1.8), longitud de la base a la punta en estiramiento 10.9 (± 2.2), circunferencia de la base del pene 8.1 cm (± 1.3), circunferencia del surco balano-prepucial 8.4 cm (± 1.3) y pliegue pubiano 2.7 (± 2.1). La longitud de la base a la punta en estiramiento tuvo correlación lineal negativa con el IMC, índice cintura-cadera y peso (r = -0.282, p<0.01, r=-0.221, p<0.05, r=-0.204, p<0.01). Además, se encontró correlación lineal positiva de la longitud de la base a la punta con la circunferencia del surco balano-prepucial y la circunferencia de la base del pene (r = 0.596, p<0.01 y 0.522, p<0.01, respectivamente). CONCLUSION: El tamaño del pene en la población mexicana es similar al reportado en otras series internacionales. PALABRAS CLAVE: Tamaño del pene; longitud del pene; grosor del pene.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Section: Antecedentesunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Correlación entre medidas antropométricas y peneanas en la población mexicana

Córdova

Mena²,

Segovia³

et al. 2018

rmu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several studies have analyzed penile biometrics in children and adults, allowing the development of nomograms that assist diagnosis and prevent misdiagnosis of micropenis, for example, [15–17]. However, there are no reports in the literature that relate the measures of the penis to the need for transurethral resection.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact Assessment of Urethral Meatus Morphology and Penile Biometry in Transurethral Prostate and Bladder Surgery

Vieiralves¹,

Conte²,

E³

et al. 2017

Advances in Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To analyze the penile and urethral meatus biometry and its correlation with meatoplasty during endoscopic resections. We also propose a new classification for urethral meatus morphology. Materials and Methods. We prospectively studied 105 patients who underwent prostate and bladder transurethral resections. We performed standardized measurement of penile and urethral meatus biometry followed by penile photo in the front position. The need to perform meatoplasty or dilatation during resectoscope introduction was registered. Data were analyzed comparing the correlation between two groups: without intervention (Group A) and with intervention (Group B). Results. We observed in Group A and Group B, respectively, the average length of urethral meatus of 1.07 cm versus 0.75 cm (p < 0.001) and average width of urethral meatus of 0.59 cm versus 0.38 cm (p < 0.001). Considering the morphology of the urethral meatus, we propose a new classification, in the following groups: (a) typical; (b) slit; (c) point-like; (d) horseshoe; and (e) megameatus. The point-like meatus was the one that most needed intervention, followed by the slit and the typical meatus (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Point-like and slit-shaped urethral meatus, as well as reduced length and width of the urethral meatus, are the determining factors.

show abstract

“…10,11 In recent years, several diagnostic tools have been developed to differentiate between SPS and BDD. 12,13 However, a drawback of the current SPS treatment is that only a few people use professional urology, sexual therapy, or psychiatry services. Many other men are too ashamed to visit clinicians and tend to seek out black market dealers and illegal medical treatment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent Updates in the Right Decision and Management of “Small Penis Syndrome”

2020

JOMH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objective Many men tend to desire a larger penis than women want because it symbolizes masculinity and sexual prowess. Micropenis is a normally developed penis with at least 2.5 standard deviations below the mean size in stretched length for age. Unlike micropenis, small penis syndrome (SPS) refers to uncomfortable feelings about one's penis size, even though penis size does not fall within the micropenis category. Some men seriously worry or feel ashamed of their penis size, and they may meet the diagnosis criteria of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). Unlike micropenis, the differential diagnosis of BDD is very important, because it is associated with high rates of committing suicide. In particular, when combined with BDD, it is known that poor outcomes after cosmetic interventions are expected. Several validated assessment tools are available to differentiate SPS and the degree of BDD, but they are still controversial. Furthermore, many physicians are performing cosmetic interventions on patients who have not been fully assessed and counseled by a psychologist, thereby leading to unsatisfactory results. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the definition of disease for penis size and review its diagnosis and treatment. This will be helpful both for physicians to enable them to provide adequate counseling and treatment and for patients to help them avoid unsatisfactory treatment.

show abstract

Erect Penile Dimensions in a Cohort of 778 Middle Eastern Men: Establishment of a Nomogram

Abstract: Introduction: Accurate data regarding the size of the erect penis of great importance to

Cited by 21 publications

References 17 publications

Correlación entre medidas antropométricas y peneanas en la población mexicana

Correlación entre medidas antropométricas y peneanas en la población mexicana

Impact Assessment of Urethral Meatus Morphology and Penile Biometry in Transurethral Prostate and Bladder Surgery

Recent Updates in the Right Decision and Management of “Small Penis Syndrome”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About