Men who were recently treated for prostate cancer (N ϭ 250) were randomly assigned to a control group, a group education intervention (GE), or a group education-plus-discussion intervention (GED). Both GE and GED increased prostate cancer knowledge. In the year postintervention, men in the GED condition were less bothered by sexual problems than men in the control condition, and they were more likely to remain steadily employed (93.0%) than men in the GE (75.6%) or control (72.5%) conditions. Among noncollege graduates, GED and GE resulted in better physical functioning than the control condition, and GED resulted in more positive health behaviors than the control or GE condition. Among college graduates, controls were comparable with the GE and GED groups in physical functioning and positive health behaviors.Key words: prostate cancer, quality of life, group intervention, education, social support Prostate cancer is the most common solid tumor malignancy and a leading cause of cancer death in American men (American Cancer Society, 2002). The majority of men afflicted with prostate cancer survive for many years, but they may suffer from a host of adverse effects of the disease or its treatments (Eton & Lepore, 2002). Thus, it is critical to develop interventions that can mitigate the adverse effects of this disease and enhance patients' quality of life (QOL). Group education and support interventions, such as "Man-to-Man" and "Us Too!," are becoming increasingly popular among men with prostate cancer. For example, Us Too! was founded in 1990 and already has more than 325 chapters in the United States (Us Too! International, Inc., 2002). However, there have been no systematic evaluations of the effects of such groups on QOL in men with prostate cancer (Germino, 2001). This article reports results from a randomized, controlled trial of group interventions designed to enhance QOL in men treated for prostate cancer.
Prostate Cancer and QOLMen with localized prostate cancer typically choose from among three types of treatments: surgical removal of the prostate (prostatectomy), external beam radiation therapy, or brachytherapy (implanting radioactive "seeds" into the prostate). Watchful waiting is an additional option for patients older than 70 years or with other major health problems. In a recent literature review (Eton & Lepore, 2002), we found that prostate cancer and its treatments result in both disease-specific problems (e.g., urinary and sexual dysfunction) and general problems in QOL (e.g., diminished mental and physical functioning, reduced capacity to work). We also found evidence of several significant social risk factors (i.e., ethnicity, education status) for poor QOL outcomes in men treated for prostate cancer.Most of the literature on QOL in prostate cancer focuses on urinary problems and sexual dysfunction (e.g., incontinence and poor erection quality, respectively; Lepore & Eton, 2000;Litwin et al., 1995;Stanford et al., 2000). A meta-analysis (Robinson, Dufour, & Fung, 1997) of 40 studies showed th...