2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-016-1055-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergodic, primal convergence in dual subgradient schemes for convex programming, II: the case of inconsistent primal problems

Abstract: Consider the utilization of a Lagrangian dual method which is convergent for consistent convex optimization problems. When it is used to solve an infeasible optimization problem, its inconsistency will then manifest itself through the divergence of the sequence of dual iterates. Will then the sequence of primal subproblem solutions still yield relevant information regarding the primal program? We answer this question in the affirmative for a convex program and an associated subgradient algorithm for its Lagran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, to find a feasible solution from a solution to (4a) we use a greedy destruction-reconstruction heuristic that removes machines from multiply-assigned tasks, and assign a machine to each unassigned task, always greedily minimizing the makespan. Second, we construct a fractional solution as the convex combination of all subproblem solutions x k (from the current branch-and-bound node) weighted proportionally to the step lengths t k ; this forms a so-called ergodic sequence of subproblem solutions; see [26,33] for details. To construct a binary solution each job is assigned to the machine with the highest fraction.…”
Section: Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, to find a feasible solution from a solution to (4a) we use a greedy destruction-reconstruction heuristic that removes machines from multiply-assigned tasks, and assign a machine to each unassigned task, always greedily minimizing the makespan. Second, we construct a fractional solution as the convex combination of all subproblem solutions x k (from the current branch-and-bound node) weighted proportionally to the step lengths t k ; this forms a so-called ergodic sequence of subproblem solutions; see [26,33] for details. To construct a binary solution each job is assigned to the machine with the highest fraction.…”
Section: Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on Lagrangian relaxation goes back to early 1970s when Held and Karp [30,31] used a Lagrangian relaxation principle on their work of a traveling salesman problem and minimum spanning trees. Many other researchers have been motivated to apply the principle in solving mathematical programming models, see for example [26,15,52,19,36,29,5,57,42,35,46].…”
Section: -Theoretical Background 21 Lagrangian Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%