2015
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1075603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonomic design and evaluation of the handle for an endoscopic dissector

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to design an endoscopic dissector handle and objectively assess its usability. The handles were designed with increased contact area between the fingers and thumb and the eye rings, and the eye rings were modified to have a more perpendicular insertion angle to the finger midline. Four different handle models were compared, including a conventional product. Subjects performed dissection, exclusion, grasping, precision manipulation and precision handling tasks. Electromyography and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the ANOVA test shown in Table 2 infers that there was no statistical significance found between the different sizes of the digital board and muscle activation, this may be due to the low values of normalized MVIC values (Shimomura et al, 2016 ). But muscle activation and muscle fatigue results indicating the difference in digital board size and writing area has an impact on muscle activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the ANOVA test shown in Table 2 infers that there was no statistical significance found between the different sizes of the digital board and muscle activation, this may be due to the low values of normalized MVIC values (Shimomura et al, 2016 ). But muscle activation and muscle fatigue results indicating the difference in digital board size and writing area has an impact on muscle activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Veelen et al [16] provided a new design of a scissor handle for dissection only and claimed advantages in terms of specialized functional improvements, without being limited by attempts to find solutions to the conflicting requirements of other functions. Shimomura et al [22] focused on the effectiveness of the general grip of the ring handle by increasing the contact area and bringing the finger insertion angle more perpendicular to the finger midline. Sancibrian et al [7] developed a new design of a pistol handle by kinematic analysis and ergonomic simulation with a hand model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific methods providing a more reliable and credible evaluation are required for LS based on ergonomic criteria [7,9]. Surface electromyography (sEMG) has been widely used to observe the muscle activity of the upper limb when working with laparoscopic tools [5,6,22,23,[38][39][40]. A goniometric study was conducted to analyze the neutral and extreme motions of the wrist, hand, forearm, and upper arms [5,7,16,23,26,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than the above discussed literature, some of the research articles discussed about ergonomic design and evaluation of laparoscopic surgical tools to reduce high pressure areas, muscle strain, and also to increase contact area between hand and the instruments (Sancibrian et al, 2014;Shimomura et al, 2015;Shimomura et al, 2016). Focusing further, researchers also reported based on the ergonomic evaluation of laparoscopic surgical instruments that reduction in pressure points, eliminating uncomfortable body postures and smaller wrist flexion can lessen the discomfort experienced by surgeons (Matern et al, 2005;Herring et al, 2010;Herman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%