2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10397-016-0959-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonomics of laparoscopic graspers and the importance of haptic feedback: the surgeons’ perspective

Abstract: Haptic feedback is drastically reduced in laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery. Introducing enhanced haptic feedback in laparoscopic instruments might well improve surgical safety and efficiency. In the design process of a laparoscopic grasper with enhanced haptic feedback, handle design should be addressed to strive for optimal usability and comfort. Additionally, the surgeons’ perspective on the potential benefits of haptic feedback should be assessed to ascertain the clinical interest of enhanced h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These percentages were lower than in some body areas; however, it has been shown that laparoscopic graspers require more force to operate compared with hemostats, and this can lead to surgeon discomfort . In this study, only 33% of respondents thought that the pain was attributable to laparoscopic surgery, which is less than in a study in those performing surgery in humans in which 77% attributed pain directly to laparoscopic instruments . With regard to ergonomics, 41% said that laparoscopic surgery has poor ergonomics compared with open surgery, and there were some additional responses that it depended on the operating room setup.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…These percentages were lower than in some body areas; however, it has been shown that laparoscopic graspers require more force to operate compared with hemostats, and this can lead to surgeon discomfort . In this study, only 33% of respondents thought that the pain was attributable to laparoscopic surgery, which is less than in a study in those performing surgery in humans in which 77% attributed pain directly to laparoscopic instruments . With regard to ergonomics, 41% said that laparoscopic surgery has poor ergonomics compared with open surgery, and there were some additional responses that it depended on the operating room setup.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Another fundamental challenge is faced when trying to make sure that the shape and dimensions of the design are consistent with the type and specific functionality of each instrument type [5]. For the instruments used in laparoscopic surgery, Alleblas et al [6] notes the need to assess expert opinions regarding the current designs of their handles. This is done in order to determine surgeons' needs and expectations with respect to the laparoscopic instruments they currently use and the possibility of the future implementation of haptic feedback in their design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few even appear in the healthcare sector, such as "Ergonomics Guidelines" [21] for surgical instruments, although none specifically discuss laparoscopic graspers. Most of these ergonomic design guides are too generic for specific applications, and there is a clear need to develop more specific guidelines for the ergonomic design of precision MIS tools [6,[22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these manipulator systems do not have a force feedback system, which is used to find the mechanical compliance of tissues undergoing the microsurgery robotic operation [17][18][19][20][21]. The authors developed a force-detecting gripper and a force feedback system for neurosurgery applications [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%