Ergotamine has been used to treat acute attacks of migraine for just on a century, first as an ingredient of an extract of ergot, and more recently as the pure substance. For a drug to have survived so long in clinical practice is testimony to its effectiveness. However there are several problems in using ergotamine that might be illuminated by clinical pharmacokinetic study. Thus the difference between the parenteral dose (0.25-0.50 mg) and the clinically equivalent oral dose (2.0-4.0 mg), and the tendency for oral administration to prove less effective than parenteral therapy, raise the possibility that the drug is incompletely bioavailable when taken by mouth. The ever-present fear of inducing ergotism whenever the drug is prescribed indicates the need to study the relation between plasma concentrations of ergotamine and its biological effects. Such clinical pharmacokinetic investigations require a drug assay of sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Until recently no such assay was available for ergotamine.The problem with assay sensitivity arises because ergotamine is used therapeutically in so low a dose that measurement of subnanogram quantities is desirable. The techniques which might yield a sufficiently sensitive assay include fluorescence spectrophotometry, gas chromatography with electron-capture detection, high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence or electrochemical detection, gas (or perhaps the newly developed high performance liquid) chromatography-mass spectrometry, and various types of immune assay (principally radio-immune assay). Ergotamine fluoresces strongly, and some published assays for the drug have depended on fluorescence detection. No adequate gas chromatographic assays appear to have been described, and one's experience with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of the drug, underivatized or derivatized, is that the molecule undergoes so much thermal decomposition that adequate assay sensitivity cannot be obtained. A radio-immune assay of reasonably adequate sensitivity is now available (1).There are two main sources of non-specificity in ergotamine assays. In aqueous solution ergotamine isomerises over some hours to its epimer ergotaminine, which is relatively inactive biologically. At equilibrium, some 60% of the original ergotamine content remains as the biologically active isomer (this also applies to the contents of ergotamine solutions for injection). Unless it could be shown that the isomers had identical pharmacokinetics, a satisfactory assay for the drug should measure only the active isomer ergotamine. The published radio-immune assay for ergotamine is suspect on this ground. However, the two isomers can be separated by high performance liquid chromatography (2, 3). The second source of assay non-specificity arises because the metabolites of ergotamine are incompletely known (4) and the drug appears to be eliminated mainly by metabolism. In this circumstance an assay involving a highly selective separation process e.g. high performance liquid chromatography, ...