2015
DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.151
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eribulin mesylate in advanced breast cancer: retrospective review of a single institute experience

Abstract: Eribulin maintains its activity out of clinical trials, without unexpected toxicities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Two publications were excluded because they were reviews [39,40], two because they were published as abstracts [41,42], four because they were case reports and small series focusing on special clinical scenarios [29][30][31][32], twelve did not report data on older patients subgroup [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Four real-world studies (three retrospective and one observational trial), involving a total of 232 patients, were included in the current analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Two publications were excluded because they were reviews [39,40], two because they were published as abstracts [41,42], four because they were case reports and small series focusing on special clinical scenarios [29][30][31][32], twelve did not report data on older patients subgroup [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Four real-world studies (three retrospective and one observational trial), involving a total of 232 patients, were included in the current analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pooled analysis of two single-arm phase 2 studies and one randomized phase 3 study in patients with metastatic breast cancer and good performance status who had received EM monotherapy reported a similar OS, PFS, overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and tolerability in selected patients older than 70 years compared to younger patients [16]. Several recent case series and case reports have addressed the clinical efficacy and safety of EM in patients with advanced breast cancer in real-world practice outside of clinical trials [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], but few studies have explored outcomes after EM monotherapy in women older than 70 years [33][34][35][36]. We were interested in determining the clinical efficacy and safety of EM in older women with breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eribulin was administered for a median of 6 cycles (range, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. All the patients reported at least stable disease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the favorable outcomes and the advantage in overall survival shown with eribulin, the European Commission issued in 2011 a marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union for eribulin for patients with metastatic breast cancer, after anthracycline and taxane treatment. Moreover, other evidence, collected in a field-practice setting, lend further support to the use of eribulin for the treatment of female breast cancer [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%