1995
DOI: 10.1515/jnet.1995.20.1.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ericksen-Leslie Liquid Crystal Theory Revisited from a Mesoscopic Point of View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means mesoscopically investigated, locally total or planar alignment of all molecules [30]. If the ODF is uniaxial, the alignment tensor has the Maier-Saupe form (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This means mesoscopically investigated, locally total or planar alignment of all molecules [30]. If the ODF is uniaxial, the alignment tensor has the Maier-Saupe form (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particle of the liquid crystal continuum theory contains a lot of molecules of different orientations, resulting in a mean orientation belonging to the considered particle described by a unit vector d. This unit vector-called the macroscopic director-is a basic field d(x, t) of the macroscopic director theory of nematic liquid crystals [28,29] (the Ericksen-Leslie theory [27]) whose microscopic background is out of scope (If the microscopic background is taken into account, the Ericksen-Leslie one-director theory allows only parallel or planar orientation of the microscopic directors [30].). As an internal variable, the macroscopic director needs an evolution equation (see Section 4.2.4).The macroscopic director as a basic field does not contain any information about the degree of orientation of the microscopic directors.…”
Section: General Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect, each observer takes himself as a standard frame of reference, what he can do without restrictions. The transformation between these standard frames of reference are given by (25) and (26). For objective quantities, all frames are standard frames of reference because of their tensor properties under changing the observer.…”
Section: Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is different from Müller [6]: The heat flux density is objective under changing the observer, but it depends on the material's motion with respect to the standard frame of reference. Finally two different descriptions of liquid crystals are juxtaposed with respect to changing the observer: The macroscopic Ericksen-Leslie theory [22,23] and the mesoscopic theory of liquid crystals [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%