1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19960726)67:4<332::aid-ajmg3>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ernst Rüdin (1874–1952) and his genealogic-demographic department in Munich (1917–1986): An introduction to their family studies of schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Epidemiologiske undersøkelser tok derfor blant annet sikte på å etablere arvegangen. Ernst Rüdin i München utviklet det som ble kalt "ärbliche Risiko-prognose", der man forsøkte å etablere tall for risikoen for psykiske lidelser hos slektninger til folk med alvorlige psykiske lidelser 2 . I praksis tok man utgangspunkt i alvorlige hospitaliserte tilstander som schizofreni og manisk depressiv sinnslidelse.…”
Section: Historikkunclassified
“…Epidemiologiske undersøkelser tok derfor blant annet sikte på å etablere arvegangen. Ernst Rüdin i München utviklet det som ble kalt "ärbliche Risiko-prognose", der man forsøkte å etablere tall for risikoen for psykiske lidelser hos slektninger til folk med alvorlige psykiske lidelser 2 . I praksis tok man utgangspunkt i alvorlige hospitaliserte tilstander som schizofreni og manisk depressiv sinnslidelse.…”
Section: Historikkunclassified
“…Family histories, genetic and social, were recorded, registered, and statistically analyzed (Gottesman & Bertelsen, 1996;Zerbin-Rudin & Kendler, 1996). After 1933, forced sterilization was implemented.…”
Section: The End Of Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kendler and Zerbin-Rü din [1][2][3] extolled Rü din's scientific contributions and lamented the fact that the continental tradition of psychiatric genetics is not fully appreciated in the anglophonic world. Two companion editorials [4][5] -an apparent stab at evenhandednessplaced Rü din's work in the context of his political activism but did little to calm the disquiet caused by Kendler and Zerbin-Rü din, whose papers drew harsh criticism from several authors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information he collected could readily be put to malevolent use: as director of the Genealogical-Demographic Department (Genealogisch-Demographische Abteilung) at the German Institute of Psychiatry or the Kraepelin Institute from 1917 to 1945-he was appointed director of the Institute in 1931, subsequently becoming a Nazi party member with generous grant support from Hitler's Reich Chancelleryhe compiled a vast data bank (on the order of tens of thousands of families) in order to calculate Mendelian ratios, based on information obtained from hospitals, asylums and other institutions. The bottom line, then: Does it really matter if the harm visited upon countless psychiatric patients occurred not while they were actively enrolled in Rü din's early studies (those reviewed by Kendler and Zerbin-Rü din [1][2][3] ) but years later, and as a direct consequence of his ideology and actions? And what greater harm is there than maiming (sterilization or castration) or murder?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%