2021
DOI: 10.24198/intermestic.v6n1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eropanisasi Kebijakan Imigrasi Dan Politisasi Keamanan Imigran Di Negara-Negara Visegrad

Abstract: The wave of migration that hit the European Union since 2015 had a political and security impact on both EU institutions and its member states. The policy of sharing responsibility or immigrant quotas did not get agreement from the Visegrad countries. Several previous studies that used a constructivist approach explained that the rejection occurred due to the securitization of immigrants in each country. This article seeks to understand the resistance of the Visegrad states from a critical perspective by using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the Visegrad Group has become a platform for its member states to provide democratic transition assistance to its neighbouring statesincluding the WB6 member states. Sugito (2021) argued that the politicization of migration issues does not necessarily represent direct aims to reject the EU's integration process but more of a process of an inward policy done by politicians to secure power in the domestic context. Instead, after the end of the Cold War, the countries were committed to developing democratic political systems, and such commitment was solidified after they acceded to the EU in 2004.…”
Section: Positioning Visegrad In the Eu's Widening Vs Deepening Dilemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the Visegrad Group has become a platform for its member states to provide democratic transition assistance to its neighbouring statesincluding the WB6 member states. Sugito (2021) argued that the politicization of migration issues does not necessarily represent direct aims to reject the EU's integration process but more of a process of an inward policy done by politicians to secure power in the domestic context. Instead, after the end of the Cold War, the countries were committed to developing democratic political systems, and such commitment was solidified after they acceded to the EU in 2004.…”
Section: Positioning Visegrad In the Eu's Widening Vs Deepening Dilemmamentioning
confidence: 99%