2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-009-3877-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erosion–corrosion behavior of plastic mold steel in solid/aqueous slurry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, many particles of abrasive sand on the GRP surface produced a repeate plastic deformation; this in turn led to fatigue cracking and hence crack coalescence, an the fatigue cracks spread and interlaced with each other over time. Therefore, the surfac was worn and torn [51]. The failure modes for 2 h of corrosion for 250 g, 400 g and 500 g of sand are shown in Figure 8(1-a-1-c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, many particles of abrasive sand on the GRP surface produced a repeate plastic deformation; this in turn led to fatigue cracking and hence crack coalescence, an the fatigue cracks spread and interlaced with each other over time. Therefore, the surfac was worn and torn [51]. The failure modes for 2 h of corrosion for 250 g, 400 g and 500 g of sand are shown in Figure 8(1-a-1-c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grewal et al 5 suggested that at 90 • impact angle, maximum mass removals take place due to the formation of deep craters and platelet mechanism, and at 60 • impact angle, plowing might be the reason of minimum mass removal rate, as the impact energy of the particles would make the material to deform plastically. Wen 37 analyzed that erosion at high impact angle occurs due to chip formation, spalling and plastic deformation, whereas erosion at low impact angle occurs due to cracks and pit formation. The erosion rate of all the samples increases with the increase in the level of slurry concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grewal et al [2] suggested that at 90˚ impact angle, platelet mechanism and formation of deep craters play a major role to maximise the mass removal rate, and at 60˚ impact angle, ploughing might be the reason of minimum mass removal rate, as the impact energy of the particles would make the material to deform plastically. Wen [38] observed that erosion at high impact angle occurs due to formation of pits and plastic deformation fatigue spalling, whereas erosion at low impact angle occurs due to formation of pits, cracks and cutting. The increase in level of slurry concentration has led to increase in erosion rate of all the samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%