1991
DOI: 10.1080/00221689109499000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erosion of cohesive bottom sediments: The influence of benthos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In soft substrates, invertebrates can move easily by disturbing the sediment structure (BREKHOVSKIKH et al, 1991), whereas in hard substrates, the structure remains more stable and invertebrates can move or swim within the interstices. In this latter case to which our study refers, the features of the interstices also control the retention and thus the distribution of bioavailable organic matter (see BRUNKE and GONSER, 1997), that can create confounding patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In soft substrates, invertebrates can move easily by disturbing the sediment structure (BREKHOVSKIKH et al, 1991), whereas in hard substrates, the structure remains more stable and invertebrates can move or swim within the interstices. In this latter case to which our study refers, the features of the interstices also control the retention and thus the distribution of bioavailable organic matter (see BRUNKE and GONSER, 1997), that can create confounding patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most of the species showed chloroplasts indicating the living status of the algae and all algae found are known to be ubiquitous species with high tolerance in terms of nutrient concentrations and water quality (Backhaus & Kemball, 1978). Only two species of Centrales were found (Melosira varians, and Stephanodiscus hantzschii) and only the latter represents a bed-deposited phytoplankton species, which emphasises the occurrence of a ''real'' microphytobenthos at this study site (Krammer & Lange-Bertalot, 1986-1991. The chlorophyll a concentrations, as an indicator for the microalgal biomass at the sediment surface, were in the range of 11-54 mg g À1 DW with minimum and maximum values of 2 and 82 mg g À1 DW, respectively, over the course of the year.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These are regarded as the most common group of benthic microalgae in cohesive sediments (Underwood, 1994). Achnanthes minutissima, Amphora ovalis, Cymatopleura solea, Diatoma vulgaris, Navicula lanceolata, Navicula tripunctata, Nitzschia constricta, Nitzschia sigmoidea, Nitzschia vermicularis, Surirella brebissonii (Bacillariophyceae, Pennales) represent a selection of the species determined for the Lauffen study site (Krammer & Lange-Bertalot, 1986-1991Lange-Bertalot, 1997). Most of the species showed chloroplasts indicating the living status of the algae and all algae found are known to be ubiquitous species with high tolerance in terms of nutrient concentrations and water quality (Backhaus & Kemball, 1978).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They measured PH, SAR, total amount of dissolved salts (TDS), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), sodium percentage (PS), and CEC for their samples and found that the eroded slopes have higher PH, SAR, and PS than the non-eroded slopes. Also, they hypothesized Table 1 Potential factors that may influence cohesive soil behavior (Winterwerp, Cornelisse, & Kuijper, 1990;Berkhovskikh, Debolsky, Vishnevskaya, & Zolotareva, 1991;Huang et al, 2006;Meng et al, 2012;and Kimiaghalam, Goharrokhi, Clark, & Ahmari, 2013 (Alberts et al, 1995;Bubenzer, 2001a, 2001b;Gyssels, Poesen, Van Dessel, Knapen, & Debaets, 2006). This study focused on the erosion of cohesive riverbanks in Manitoba, Canada where erosion has caused considerable damage to shorelines within the Province.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%