2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjmsu.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erosion of Vascular Graft into the Bladder 5 Years after Original Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The encrusted graft was left in situ and the patient subsequently had the old graft removed and a new bypass graft inserted by vascular surgery 1 . Another vascular graft eroded 5 years after original arterial reconstruction into the bladder and was managed conservatively 10 . In the third case, a calcification in the bladder wall suggestive of a urinary stone was detected on imaging.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The encrusted graft was left in situ and the patient subsequently had the old graft removed and a new bypass graft inserted by vascular surgery 1 . Another vascular graft eroded 5 years after original arterial reconstruction into the bladder and was managed conservatively 10 . In the third case, a calcification in the bladder wall suggestive of a urinary stone was detected on imaging.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Another vascular graft eroded 5 years after original arterial reconstruction into the bladder and was managed conservatively. 10 In the third case, a calcification in the bladder wall suggestive of a urinary stone was detected on imaging. Flexible cystoscopy revealed a friable vascular mass high on the left wall of the bladder, which was biopsied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%