2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021wr030688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erosion Process of Multiple Debris Flow Surges Caused by Check Dam Removal: An Experimental Study

Abstract: Debris flows are one of the most serious natural disasters on Earth and cause great losses in human life and property each year. Check dams have been widely utilized in debris flow hazard mitigation, and over time, some control projects have exceeded their designed service lifetime. However, the processes of stored sediment erosion with multiple surges of debris flows after check dam removal are unknown. Here, the stored sediment erosion processes associated with different reductions in the dam height (i.e., t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(187 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this period, the debris flow's ability to remove sediment from the toe exceeds the supply of sediment from bank failures. The rapid removal of supplied sediment was observed in the experiments (video data in Wang et al, 2024, such as Case 1-S4 and Case 1-S10), which is attributed to the strong sediment transport capacity of debris flows (Cui et al, 2013;Garcia-Martinez & Lopez, 2005) and the steep channel bed. Consequently, the rate of bank retreat is primarily controlled by the erosion rate of in-situ soil at the toe by debris flows.…”
Section: 'Basal Endpoint Control' In the Bank Retreat Process Of Debr...mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…During this period, the debris flow's ability to remove sediment from the toe exceeds the supply of sediment from bank failures. The rapid removal of supplied sediment was observed in the experiments (video data in Wang et al, 2024, such as Case 1-S4 and Case 1-S10), which is attributed to the strong sediment transport capacity of debris flows (Cui et al, 2013;Garcia-Martinez & Lopez, 2005) and the steep channel bed. Consequently, the rate of bank retreat is primarily controlled by the erosion rate of in-situ soil at the toe by debris flows.…”
Section: 'Basal Endpoint Control' In the Bank Retreat Process Of Debr...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The mean and standard deviation of peak h for each surge were 6.4 and 0.7 cm, respectively. The Fr corresponding to peak h ranged from 3.2 to 4.2 (Figure 3b), which was considered reasonable based on Fr from field cases (Du et al, 2023;Guo et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2022;Zhou et al, 2019). Moreover, the erodible banks were prepared through the following steps: bank soils were paved in a layer-by-layer manner (not compacted), and each layer was approximately 20 mm in thickness.…”
Section: 1029/2023wr036914mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2020) used this method to systematically analyze glacial debris flow deposits along the Sichuan‐Tibet railway. Some empirical methods have also been proposed to predict the velocity and run‐out distance by considering various factors (C. Chang et al., 2011; Q. Fang et al., 2019; X. Wang et al., 2022). These methods are important for conducting quick risk assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%