2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERP correlates of processing native and non-native language word stress in infants with different language outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Friederici et al (2007) demonstrated that 4-5 months old German and French infants showed specific 5 MMR to the native stress patterns: German infants to the deviant with stress on the second syllable and French infants to the deviant with stress on the first syllable. Friedrich et al (2009) found an early and a late MMR in 4-5 months old German infants to the deviant with a native stress pattern. According to these studies, infants can discriminate changes in the stress patterns of words as early as 4-5 months, and a preference to native stress patterns can be demonstrated as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Friederici et al (2007) demonstrated that 4-5 months old German and French infants showed specific 5 MMR to the native stress patterns: German infants to the deviant with stress on the second syllable and French infants to the deviant with stress on the first syllable. Friedrich et al (2009) found an early and a late MMR in 4-5 months old German infants to the deviant with a native stress pattern. According to these studies, infants can discriminate changes in the stress patterns of words as early as 4-5 months, and a preference to native stress patterns can be demonstrated as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Inspection of the 567 nonunique results revealed two additional journal articles and one additional thesis that were missing in the original list. The complete list of items is shown in Table 1; in addition, Friedrich et al (2009) provide a rich analysis of electroencephalographic data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results focusing on prosodic words appear stable, as two studies with different samples and tasks-albeit coming from the same research group-report positive results. Both Weber, Hahne, Friedrich, and Friederici (2005) and Friedrich, Herold, and Friederici (2009) investigated processing of different word-level stress patterns at 5 months using ERPs. Children were later classified into high versus low vocabulary based on their language outcomes (at 12 and 24 months in Weber et al, 2005, and at 30 months in Friedrich et al, 2009).…”
Section: Qualitative Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first electrophysiological studies on infants' automatic detection of trochaic pattern revealed discriminative abilities below the age of 6 months as well. Weber, Hahne, Friedrich, and Friederici (2004) and Friedrich, Herold, and Friederici (2009) found that German infants of 5 months could well discriminate words of different stress patterns, showing a positive mismatch response to deviants with stress on the first syllable contrasted with standards with stress on the second syllable (Weber et al, 2004), as well as for deviants with stress on the second syllable contrasted with standards of first syllable stress (Friedrich et al, 2009). Friederici, Friedrich, and Christophe (2007) demonstrated in a cross-linguistic study that in German and French infants a language-specific word stress pattern detection was present as early as the 4 th month of age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leppänen et al (2002) tested the detection of stress information while changing the duration of consonants. Friederici and her colleagues (Friederici et al (2007), Friedrich et al (2009) and Weber et al (2004) investigated the infants' early sensitivity to stress information by varying the duration of vowels. In contrast, our approach was to use acoustically rich stress information, including several specific cues related to syllabic stress, such as intensity, F0, and rise time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%