2014
DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-10-2013-0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERP system implementation announcements: does the market cheer or jeer the adopters and vendors?

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of the study is to examine the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) on the announcement of firms’ stock market returns. The authors investigate the stock market reaction on ERP adopters and ERP vendor firms in the USA during 1990-2010. The study examines firm- and non-firm-specific factors including the role of the financial analyst in explaining the determinants of the cumulative abnormal returns surrounding ERP announcements of adopting firms. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They find that the effectiveness of corporate governance is enhanced and performance 75 Risk management and firm value improved in the post-financial crisis period, consistent with the theoretical predictions of Bolton et al (2011) and Gamba and Triantis (2014), as well as the empirical results of Baxter et al (2013); Allayannis et al (2012); Fauver and Naranjo (2010) and Lel (2012). Ajit et al (2014) use an event study methodology to examine whether firms experience abnormal stock returns following the announcement of ERM implementation. They find abnormal risk-adjusted returns of 1.12 per cent during the three-day window surrounding such announcements.…”
Section: Ijaim 241supporting
confidence: 62%
“…They find that the effectiveness of corporate governance is enhanced and performance 75 Risk management and firm value improved in the post-financial crisis period, consistent with the theoretical predictions of Bolton et al (2011) and Gamba and Triantis (2014), as well as the empirical results of Baxter et al (2013); Allayannis et al (2012); Fauver and Naranjo (2010) and Lel (2012). Ajit et al (2014) use an event study methodology to examine whether firms experience abnormal stock returns following the announcement of ERM implementation. They find abnormal risk-adjusted returns of 1.12 per cent during the three-day window surrounding such announcements.…”
Section: Ijaim 241supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Also it is imperative that the vendor support is received during the implementation failing which the product interpretation may not be sufficient to fill the gaps identified (Remus, 2007;Somers and Nelson, 2001). Vendor stability and product support is a great positive for ERP implementation; in fact it may also lead to rising stock prices for the client organization, on the flip side the absence of the same is a risk (Ajit et al, 2014;Brennen and Hughes, 1991). An important aspect of project performance is stress testing; in case the stress testing of the product is not done it may be cause of a stalled ERP project (Remus, 2007;Somers and Nelson, 2001).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent studies have pointed out that knowledge sharing plays a mediating role linking information systems maturity and firm performance (Rao et al, 2015). It can enhance the business value by increasing investor confidence (Ajit et al, 2014), return-on-assets and return-on-investment, increasing technological competence (Galy and Sauceda, 2014). However, the implementation and adoption of ERP systems across many industries and organisations have resulted in both failures and successes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%