2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/723/2/1827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERRATUM: “AGN DUSTY TORI. II. OBSERVATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF CLUMPINESS” (2008, ApJ, 685, 160)

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

65
662
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(729 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
65
662
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, silicate emission features in type 1 AGN are much weaker than expected from early torus models, which used smooth dust distributions. As shown in the literature, this might be explained by clumpiness of the dust in the torus, which leads to an overall suppression of the emission feature (Nenkova et al 2002;Dullemond & van Bemmel 2005;Hönig et al 2006;Schartmann et al 2008;Nenkova et al 2008;Hönig & Kishimoto 2010). However, as will be shown in the second paper of this series (Hönig & Kishimoto 2010, pre-print available on astro-ph), weak emission features are not a generic property of clumpy torus models but might be used to constrain some model parameters of the dust distribution in clumpy tori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In particular, silicate emission features in type 1 AGN are much weaker than expected from early torus models, which used smooth dust distributions. As shown in the literature, this might be explained by clumpiness of the dust in the torus, which leads to an overall suppression of the emission feature (Nenkova et al 2002;Dullemond & van Bemmel 2005;Hönig et al 2006;Schartmann et al 2008;Nenkova et al 2008;Hönig & Kishimoto 2010). However, as will be shown in the second paper of this series (Hönig & Kishimoto 2010, pre-print available on astro-ph), weak emission features are not a generic property of clumpy torus models but might be used to constrain some model parameters of the dust distribution in clumpy tori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Monitoring results covering an even broader dynamical range of luminosity may be required to definitively rule out any of those alternative scenarios. Within the framework of our BLR model, we can also estimate the radial size of the BLR, assuming that it covers the region from the radius where T eff = 1000 K to the beginning of the dusty torus, R dust ∼ 0.4 L 1/2 45 pc (Nenkova et al 2008). The ratio of the two radii can be expressed in terms of the black hole mass, the accretion rate, and the accretion flow efficiency η (L bol = ηṀc 2 ) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the seminal works about clumpy tori (Nenkova et al 2008) there is growing evidence against the monolithic obscurer envisaged by unified models Masini et al 2016;Marinucci et al 2016) of the Compton-thick clouds in the circumnuclear environment of NGC 4945. Fig.…”
Section: Clumpiness Of the Reflectormentioning
confidence: 99%