2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.87.039901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Branching fraction measurements of the color-suppressed decaysB¯0toD(*)0<

Abstract: Erratum: Branching fraction measurements of the color-suppressed decays B 0 to D ðÃÞ0 0 , D ðÃÞ0 , D ðÃÞ0 !, and D ðÃÞ0 0 and measurement of the polarization in the decay Phys. Rev. D 84, 112007 (2011)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…it is important to test other values originated from already measured colour-suppressed B-meson decays, as non factorizing final state interactions can modify the decay dynamics [27]. Among them, the decay B 0 → DK * 0 plays such a role for which LHCb obtains r B = 0.22 +0.17 −0.27 [21], confirmed by a more recent and accurate computation: r B = 0.265±0.023 [28].…”
Section: B Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…it is important to test other values originated from already measured colour-suppressed B-meson decays, as non factorizing final state interactions can modify the decay dynamics [27]. Among them, the decay B 0 → DK * 0 plays such a role for which LHCb obtains r B = 0.22 +0.17 −0.27 [21], confirmed by a more recent and accurate computation: r B = 0.265±0.023 [28].…”
Section: B Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The procedure employs the sPlot technique [110], where an extended unbinned maximum-likelihood fit to the two-dimensional distribution is performed. The signal is described using a modified Novosibirsk function [111] and the background is modelled by a product of an exponential function and a positive polynomial function [87]. Each candidate is assigned a positive weight for being signal-like or a negative weight for being background-like, with the masses of the two D 0 candidates as the discriminating variables.…”
Section: Non-d 0 Background Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Imperfect knowledge of detector resolution model: to estimate the associated systematic uncertainty alternative resolution functions are studied, namely a symmetric variant of an Apollonios function [112]; a modified Gaussian function with symmetric power-law tails on both sides of the distribution [113,114]; a generalised symmetric Student's t-distribution [115,116]; a symmetric Johnson's S U distribution [117,118]; and a modified Novosibirsk function [111].…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Imperfect knowledge of the detector resolution model. To estimate the associated systematic uncertainty a set of alternative resolution functions is tested: a symmetric variant of an Apollonios function [109], a modified Gaussian function with symmetric power-law tails on both sides of the distribution [110,111], a generalised symmetric Student's t-distribution [112,113], a symmetric Johnson's S U distribution [114,115], and a modified Novosibirsk function [116].…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• a component corresponding to genuine D 1 D 2 pairs and described as a product of two signal functions, each parameterised with a modified Novosibirsk function [116];…”
Section: Non-d Background Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%