2016
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Calculation of the Ki67 index in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative analysis of four counting methodologies

Abstract: Ki67 index is now an essential part of classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, its adaptation into daily practice has been fraught with challenges related to counting methodology. In this study, three reviewers used four counting methodologies to calculate Ki67 index in 68 well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: (1) 'eye-ball' estimation, which has been advocated as reliable and is widely used; (2) automated counting by image analyzer; (3) manual eye-counting (eye under a mic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 However, both mitotic index and Ki-67 measurements are susceptible to sampling issues, interpretation errors, and may not truly reflect the clinical behaviour of these neoplasms as WHO grade 1 tumours can also develop distant metastases. 14 15 Thus, additional biomarkers are needed to improve the prognostic classification and management of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 However, both mitotic index and Ki-67 measurements are susceptible to sampling issues, interpretation errors, and may not truly reflect the clinical behaviour of these neoplasms as WHO grade 1 tumours can also develop distant metastases. 14 15 Thus, additional biomarkers are needed to improve the prognostic classification and management of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NET cases where the Ki67 index was close to the cutoffs, high magnification (400×) microphotographs of the hot spots were taken. The captured images were then analyzed manually on a printed copy [32]. A Ki67 index > 20% was a necessary requisite for pdNEC definition, in addition to a poorly differentiated histologic structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perceived advantages and disadvantages of each counting method are summarised in Table 2. To date, manual counting is considered to be the gold standard method to count the Ki67 proliferation index in neuroendocrine neoplasms 5,10,11 . It is highly accurate, readily available, permitting inclusion/exclusion of specific areas and allowing case‐based adjustment of positive threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various digital image analysis platforms and machine learning (ML)-based algorithms have shown to be highly sensitive and specific to obtain an automatic reading of the Ki67 index in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and breast carcinomas. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The utility of these platforms in determining the Ki67 index in MTC is yet to be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%