2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.72.019903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Electromagnetically induced left-handedness in a dense gas of three-level atoms [Phys. Rev. A70, 053806 (2004)]

Abstract: The formula ͓Eq. ͑19͔͒ for the induced dipole moment of the atom contains a sign mistake in the exponent. After correcting the error it should read ͑1͒As the expression includes the complex conjugate, there is a term matched to the probe field and the conclusions in the paper are not affected.In the sixth paragraph, it is stated that two media related as ⑀ 2 ͑͒ =−⑀ 1 ͑͒ and 2 ͑͒ =− 1 ͑͒ would have the same indices of refraction. This is incorrect. These relations give two media with the same wave impedance but… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition dipole matrix elements are related to the radiative decay rates via d 34 (µ 21 /c) = 3πε 0 γ 3 (γ 2 ) c 3 /ω 3 for a typical optical wavelength of 600nm. We find substantial negative refraction and minimal absorption for this density, which is about a factor of 10 2 smaller than the density needed without taking chirality into account [16]. It should also be noted that the magnetic permeability differs by less than 10% from unity for the density considered here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transition dipole matrix elements are related to the radiative decay rates via d 34 (µ 21 /c) = 3πε 0 γ 3 (γ 2 ) c 3 /ω 3 for a typical optical wavelength of 600nm. We find substantial negative refraction and minimal absorption for this density, which is about a factor of 10 2 smaller than the density needed without taking chirality into account [16]. It should also be noted that the magnetic permeability differs by less than 10% from unity for the density considered here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For such schemes it is well known that there is destructive interference for the absorption and constructive interference for the dispersive cross-coupling between the |1 −|3 and |1 − |2 transitions in the limit γ 2 ≪ γ 3 and if the transition |1 − |2 is two-photon resonant with the probe field E and the coupling field Ω c [10]. A similar set-up has been discussed recently by Oktel and Müstecaplioglu [16] for the purpose of generating negative refraction by means of a large negative permeability µ. However, they did not examine induced chirality and its effect on the index of refraction, which as we show below, is the most important contribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…More recently, exotic properties such as left-handed electromagnetic responses have been theoretically proposed using dense homogenous atomic vapors with number density N 0 ∼ 10 23 m −3 or higher [17][18][19][20][21]. However, because quantum interference is fragile, the performance of thermal atomic vapors is severely affected by collisional dephasing and Doppler broadening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…× − C · m s − [16], respectively. The density of atom N was chosen to be × m − [21]. And the other parameters are scaled by γ = s − : Γ = .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the distinction between the applied elds and the microscopic local elds acting upon the atoms when discussing the detailed properties of the atomic transitions between the levels relating to the electric and magnetic susceptibilities, there is little di erence between the macroscopic elds and the local elds [18,21] in the dilute vapour case. However, the polarization of neighbouring atoms gives rise to an internal eld at any given atom in addition to the average macroscopic eld.…”
Section: Model and Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%