1991
DOI: 10.1063/1.555886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: ‘‘Energy Levels of Sulfur, S I through S XVI’’ [J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1 9, 821 (1990)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
179
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
21
179
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The values quoted in the literature are reported too, and we find a good agreement with previous works [12].…”
Section: -Experimental Set-upsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values quoted in the literature are reported too, and we find a good agreement with previous works [12].…”
Section: -Experimental Set-upsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As stated before, the fine-structure separation of the SD(3s4d) term is already well known and the existing data [9,12] …”
Section: -Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two models were developed to investigate whether the additional configuration interaction terms influenced the resulting collision strengths in any way. Energy levels produced by the two models are presented in Table 6, along with those of Zhang et al (1994) and experimental energies of Martin & Zalubas (1980). From Table 6 it can be seen that all but 5 of the M1 energies are within 1% of the experimental values.…”
Section: Target Modelmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Good agreement was found between the theoretical EUV line intensities and SUMER and SERTS-89 solar measurements, with differences of less than 17%. Intensities for the strongest soft X-ray lines were Zhang et al (1994) and the experimental energies (Martin & Zalubas 1980) from the NIST database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%