1958
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690040420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Heats of vaporization of hydrogen bonded substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Pauling 34 discussed the hydrogen-bond strength for water and different alcohols and stated that onefifth of the energy contributions can be attributed to the van der Waals forces, and the rest represents the hydrogen-bond strength. Also, it was discussed that based on enthalpies of sublimation and formation of dimers, trimers, and tetramers, the hydrogen-bond energy contribution is in the range of 5000−6000 cal/mol in the case of water and aliphatic alcohols which agrees with the values given in the erratum of Bondi 35 (Table 5).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…34 Pauling 34 discussed the hydrogen-bond strength for water and different alcohols and stated that onefifth of the energy contributions can be attributed to the van der Waals forces, and the rest represents the hydrogen-bond strength. Also, it was discussed that based on enthalpies of sublimation and formation of dimers, trimers, and tetramers, the hydrogen-bond energy contribution is in the range of 5000−6000 cal/mol in the case of water and aliphatic alcohols which agrees with the values given in the erratum of Bondi 35 (Table 5).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Bondi and Simkin used the experimental data from Rossini and Fiock to obtain E h parameters for different alcohols (including methanol, ethanol, and n -propanol) at different temperatures. The corrected data for methanol, ethanol, and n -propanol can be found in the erratum of Bondi and Simkin and are listed here in Table .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation