“…In this case, two hypotheses can be suggested: the size effect (µm vs. nm) and the electrical properties of the oxidizer component (conductive, semi-conductive, or insulating). Regarding the former, previous works have shown that the use of micrometer-sized oxidizer particles does not have a significant impact on the ESD threshold value compared to oxidizer nanoparticles [33,34]. For example, when Cr 2 O 3 (Sigma-Aldrich, PS > µm, SSA = 3 m 2 /g) and WO3 (Sigma Aldrich, PS = 20 µm, SSA = 1 m 2 /g) microparticles were used in Al nm-based thermites (Al, Nanotechnologies Inc., PS = 50 nm, SSA = 40 m 2 /g), instead of nanoparticles, the ESD threshold was determined to be 0.14 mJ, i.e., widely lower than the ESD value determined in the present case for the Al-nm/ITO µm energetic system (13.70 mJ).…”