1998
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.58.2617.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Influence of decorrelation on Heisenberg-limited interferometry with quantum correlated photons [Phys. Rev. A57, 4004 (1998)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is of interest for Heisenberg-limited interferometry, as was first proposed by Holland and Burnett [6,7]. It is also equivalent to the generation of a bright entangled state, albeit a nonmaximally entangled one.…”
Section: Summary Of the Most Important Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is of interest for Heisenberg-limited interferometry, as was first proposed by Holland and Burnett [6,7]. It is also equivalent to the generation of a bright entangled state, albeit a nonmaximally entangled one.…”
Section: Summary Of the Most Important Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nonetheless, the quantum interference effect is still taking place, as we proved theoretically some time ago [7]. The effect of this interference was essentially to bunch all photons at either beam splitter's output, thereby creating an extremely noisy photon-number differ-…”
Section: Summary Of the Most Important Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such states give the Heisenberg limit as well [16], even though the measurement procedure is complicated by the fact that the output intensities show no interference fringes. A Bayesian detection procedure [15] was proposed to remedy the situation and we have confirmed its experimental feasibility by numerically simulating nonideal conditions [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the four possible beam-splitter scattering probability amplitudes, the two corresponding to the output state Of even greater interest is the situation where the beam splitter input is |k a ,ǫ, ω; N a |k b ,ǫ, ω; N b [20] or, better yet, the more general form expressed by Eq. (1), for which the physics is identical [16]. Close approximations to such states are generated above threshold in a type II OPO, which emits intense, laser-like, cross-polarized, numberdifference squeezed beams [21] that can be frequencystabilized by use of standard techniques of laser metrology [22,23] or optical self-locking [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%