Erratum: Optical Pumping into Many-Body Entanglement [Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 020504 (2011)]

Effect of interlayer coupling on the coexistence of antiferromagnetism and superconductivity in Fe pnictide superconductors: A study ofCa0.74(1)La0.26(1Jiang1, Liu2, Schütt3 et al. 2016Phys. Rev. B232181View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…Both of them have similar atomic constituents and very close values for the interlayer FeAs distance. However, in contrast to the 112, where an extended AFM-SC coexistence region emerges, the 10-3-8 shows no coexistence -or at best a very limited region of coexistence 32,33 . One of the most salient differences between these two classes of compounds is the fact that in the 10-3-8, the spacer layer is insulating, whereas in the 112 it is metallic.…”

Charmonium Charged States

“…In refs. [20,21], Cho et al have suggest that studying the production of these exotic states in relativistic heavy ion collisions offer a promising resolution to this problem as yields of exotic hadrons are expected to be strongly affected by their structures. However, it might be very difficult to observe the new charmonium states discussed above in relativistic heavy ions collisions at LHC.…”

Steady entanglement in bosonic dissipative networks

“…In the most important case of preparing and protecting entangled states, recent theoretical protocols, also based on engineering the decay process [10], have all been shown possible with only dissipation as a resource. However, most of these theoretical schemes concentrate on the preparation of atomic maximally entangled states of two qubits [11], the W state of three qubits [12], or atomic multipartite entangled states [13]. Furthermore, we could mention schemes for preparing nonmaximal steady entanglements of two or three oscillators coupled to a common reservoir [14], while, more recently, a proposal has been advanced to engineer a common squeezed reservoir for an ensemble of oscillators that has genuine multipartite entanglement [15].…”