2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4986799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “Prediction uncertainty and optimal experimental design for learning dynamical systems” [Chaos 26, 063110 (2016)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Letham, Letham, Rudin, and Browne (2016) developed a method that uses prediction as a measure for testing the usefulness of carrying out additional experiments. They derived theoretical properties of their method (note the small correction presented in Letham, Letham, Rudin, and Browne (2017)) and applied it to real data. Shulkind, Horesh, and Avron (2018) considered a class of misspecified dynamic models and suggested a novel formulation for experimental design.…”
Section: Design Of Experiments Model Selection and Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Letham, Letham, Rudin, and Browne (2016) developed a method that uses prediction as a measure for testing the usefulness of carrying out additional experiments. They derived theoretical properties of their method (note the small correction presented in Letham, Letham, Rudin, and Browne (2017)) and applied it to real data. Shulkind, Horesh, and Avron (2018) considered a class of misspecified dynamic models and suggested a novel formulation for experimental design.…”
Section: Design Of Experiments Model Selection and Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%