2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.78.049902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Relativistic quasiparticle time blocking approximation: Dipole response of open-shell nuclei [Phys. Rev. C 78, 014312 (2008)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
260
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
260
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, such couplings have been introduced successfully in the relativistic scheme using the spectral representation in Refs. [24]. On the non-relativistic side, such techniques have also been used in the context of the non-spectral representation without [62,63] and with [64] pairing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, such couplings have been introduced successfully in the relativistic scheme using the spectral representation in Refs. [24]. On the non-relativistic side, such techniques have also been used in the context of the non-spectral representation without [62,63] and with [64] pairing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is not described well in this simple RPA approach. It has been shown in recent investigations of the coupling to complex configurations within the framework of the relativistic time-blocking approximation (RTBA) or the relativistic quasiparticle-time-blocking approximation (RQTBA) [24] that such couplings can be taken into account successfully in a fully consistent way starting from one density functional E[ρ]. So far, relativistic investigations of this type have been carried out with discrete methods.…”
Section: Isoscalar Giant Monopole Resonancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These approaches have been supplemented by considering a self-consistent mean field (see, e.g., Ref [5]) or the self-consistency between the mean-field and the effective interaction [6][7][8]. The latter made it possible to perform the calculation with one unique set of interaction parameters (e.g., the Skyrme force [6,8]) instead of two sets of parameters as used in non-self-consistent approaches (one for the effective interaction and another for the mean field).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%