1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.46.5210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Review of Particle Properties

Abstract: ERRATA v @,=arg(g,,g~, I = @ + ---m o d r 2 (instead of @+ -modv).As a consequence, the CP-violating asymmetry given by Eq. i26), is ( 14.331 1.3 )%, significantly larger than the result i 3.8+ 1.4 1% stated in the paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…II. In what follows, I shall use the prescription of the Particle Data Group [36] for estimating confidence limits, namely, I shall assume that the errors shown in Eq. (14) are normally distributed with a mean value at −0.004 but with a renormalized probability distribution that is non-zero only when the manifestly positive quantity between the brackets in Eq.…”
Section: E Constraint On Excited State Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…II. In what follows, I shall use the prescription of the Particle Data Group [36] for estimating confidence limits, namely, I shall assume that the errors shown in Eq. (14) are normally distributed with a mean value at −0.004 but with a renormalized probability distribution that is non-zero only when the manifestly positive quantity between the brackets in Eq.…”
Section: E Constraint On Excited State Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, pair production has only a small effect on P (r, E; E c ) for E c ≥ 10 20 eV, where the proton life time due to pion production is ≤ 3 × 10 8 yr. We calculated therefore P (r, E; E c ) taking into account pion production interactions only. We used the compilation of cross sections given in Hikasa et al (1992), and assumed that the total cross section corresponds to the isotropic production of a single pion (this assumption has been shown to be adequate in Yoshida & Teshima 1993;Aharonian & Cronin 1994). The resulting probability distribution may be approximated well over the energy range of interest by a function of the form…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixing in the quark sector is described by the Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (3×3) unitary matrix V ij . It is known to a rather high accuracy [1], and the information about mixing parameters is continually refined. It is natural to expect that a similar mixing phenomenon occurs in the lepton sector of the SM as well, provided that the neutrino mass spectrum is nondegenerate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [9] that a new type of mixing -mixing in quark-lepton currents -must be considered in this approach. The resulting additional freedom in the choice of parameters makes it possible to remove the lower bound on the vector-leptoquark mass M X obtained from rare decays of π and K mesons [1]. The only constraint that does not depend on mixing arises from the cosmological estimate of the width of the decay π 0 → νν [10]: M X > 18 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%