2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Revisiting the Cygnus OB associations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore it would appear that the large-scale expansion we have identified began before these stars and clusters formed and thus the driving force of the expansion would have acted on the primordial molecular clouds and not the stars we observe today. The traceback ages are also consistent with the expansion ages for the individual OB associations estimated by Quintana & Wright ( 2021, 2022, which are themselves larger than the evolutionary ages for the associations. This suggests that the expansion of the individual OB associations was not driven by their own (stellar) dynamics or processes such as residual gas expulsion, but was seeded prior to their formation, potentially by the same process responsible for the large-scale expansion patterns studied here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Therefore it would appear that the large-scale expansion we have identified began before these stars and clusters formed and thus the driving force of the expansion would have acted on the primordial molecular clouds and not the stars we observe today. The traceback ages are also consistent with the expansion ages for the individual OB associations estimated by Quintana & Wright ( 2021, 2022, which are themselves larger than the evolutionary ages for the associations. This suggests that the expansion of the individual OB associations was not driven by their own (stellar) dynamics or processes such as residual gas expulsion, but was seeded prior to their formation, potentially by the same process responsible for the large-scale expansion patterns studied here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%