2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.199907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Screened Coulomb interaction calculations: cRPA implementation and applications to dynamical screening and self-consistency in uranium dioxide and cerium [Phys. Rev. B 89, 125110 (2014)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). In contrast, collinear 1k AFM calculations by constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) methods were obtained with U = 5.70 eV and J = 0.40 eV, 122 i.e. considerably higher than in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…4). In contrast, collinear 1k AFM calculations by constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) methods were obtained with U = 5.70 eV and J = 0.40 eV, 122 i.e. considerably higher than in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…(17)]. The LR KS equations (45) were solved using the conjugate-gradient algorithm [64] and the mixing scheme of Ref. [78] for the response Hxc potential (47) to speed up convergence.…”
Section: Technical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21), respectively]. In fact, this cost is very small compared to that of solving self-consistent LR KS equations (45). Putting everything together, the direct comparison between the costs of LR-cDFT and DFPT gives, after simple algebraic manipulations, the following ratio:…”
Section: Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, DMFT calculations performed for a low-energy "f -spdf " Hamiltonian comprising s-, p-, dand f -states, and a Hubbard correction for the f -states of this order of magnitude yield good agreement between theory and a vast body of experimental probes [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Quite embarrassingly, however, cRPA calculations for an f -spdf Hamiltonian, where localized states are constructed for an energy window containing s-, p-, dand f -states but the polarization is constrained to only exclude screening among the f -states, give a ridiculously small value (< 1 eV) [25,26] [27].We argue here that both considering a second shell as correlated and treating the intershell interaction at least in an effective manner are crucial ingredients to remedy this problem. For α-Ce, assuming f -and d-states to be correlated within cRPA, we find an intershell interaction U f d = 1.8 eV, as compared to U f f = 6.5 eV and a negligible intersite V f f = 0.01 eV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%